Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL. MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE: 5 <br />CRYSTAL BAY SEWER PROJECT <br />Mayor Butler replied that there is no reason to put <br />water in this area. Butler explained that there is no <br />water towed, and the City would have to build another <br />water tower. Butler asked the Public Works <br />Coordinator if there is any block grant monies <br />available. <br />Public Works Coordinator Gerhardson stated that the <br />City receives $28,000 a year in block grant monies. <br />Gerhardson stated that the City can use this money for <br />sewer projects. <br />George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive reviewed with <br />the Council his letter he submitted at the meeting. <br />Such letter is attached to page 14 of these minutes. <br />Rovegno stated that the appraiser used a theory to come <br />up with the appraisals. Rovegno reviewed his letter <br />with the Council in which he believed the appraisals <br />were facetious and fallacious. <br />One man stated that the Crystal Bay area is unique. He <br />noted that the value of the houses are such that they <br />aren't going to increase $10,000 when they get ready to <br />sell their property. <br />Councilmember Adams stated that after seeing the <br />appraisals, he would be in favor of the 50-50 assessment <br />option. Adams noted that the Council should not take <br />any action until the other two Councilmembers can be <br />present. <br />Counci lmember Hammerel stated that the would be in favor <br />of the 50-50 assessment option. <br />Gary Printup of 1261 Briar Street asked the Council to <br />approve the 70-30 assessment option. <br />Mayor Butler closed the public hearingat 9:14 p.m. <br />Butler asked staff to bring back the following <br />information for the meeting of December 10, 1984 to <br />continue the Crystal Bay sewer project discussion: <br />1. The difference in cost if the City ised a grinder <br />puma. <br />2. The impact. of the cost on the project if the City <br />doesn't have to pay for easements. <br />3. Staff to be able to show where those easements are <br />to be taker from. <br />4. Staff to bring back figures as to how much it will <br />reduce the sewer project cost to reduce the size of <br />the proposed streets. <br />