My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1984 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1984
>
11-13-1984 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/30/2025 1:18:35 PM
Creation date
10/30/2025 1:12:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE: REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING HELD NOVEMBER 13, 1984 PAGE 4 <br />CRYSTAL BAY SHWE:R PROJECT <br />One lady wanted to clarify the petition that was signed <br />by many Crystal Flay residents. She noted that the <br />petition was not any indication that the residents <br />don't want sewer, but that the neighborhood was opposed <br />to the method of assessment that th^ f7ity is considering <br />(Example 50-50 option). <br />One man noted that. there are many people who are <br />included in the sewer project that don't want sewer <br />because they don't have problems with their existing <br />septic systems. <br />Mayor Butler remarked that at the last meeting, one of <br />'lie Councilmembers asked staff to investigate how much <br />,.he general tax payer would have to pay if a portion of <br />,he project was spread across the general tax rolls. <br />Butler used an example of an Orono resident who had a <br />household income of $25,000 and if the property was <br />worth $75,00t', the addition to that individuals tax <br />bill would be $29.50 per year over the life of the bonds <br />(15 years). Butler used another example of an Orono <br />resident who had a net tax per year of $50, 000 and lived <br />in a $200,000 home; his tax increase for picking up half <br />the bill for this sewer project would be $41 .19 a year. <br />Butler noted these examples would be if the City was to <br />choose the 50-50 assessed option for the project. <br />Butler stated if the City was to pick up 70 percent of the <br />project, that same person at $25,000 a year living in a <br />$75,000 home would have an increase of $35.40 per year <br />over 15 years. Butler reminded the audience if any <br />portion of the project is put on the general tax rolls, <br />that they are also on the general tax rolls and world <br />also receive that increase in their basic real estate <br />tax. <br />George Rovegno of 2010 Shoreline Drive stated that <br />nothing says the City can't j:st pay for a portion of <br />this project out of the general budget and not assess <br />the general tax payer. Rovegno stated that way it <br />would, just mean that the City has to be more <br />conservative in the rest of its operations. <br />John Ericson of 1620 Shadywood Road stated that he is in <br />the sewer and water construction business. Ericson <br />noted if this should come to the point where the City <br />asks the general tax payer to pay for a portion of the <br />project, he personally would have no problem with an <br />additional $30 a year. Ericson stated that he would <br />object if the City doesn't put in a water main along with <br />the sewer line at the same time. Ericson stated that it <br />would be a waste if the City put in sewer now, and five <br />years from new had to tear up the streets aqain to put in <br />water. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.