My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Project Packet
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
B
>
Bayside Road
>
3445 Bayside Road
>
Land Use
>
80-589, SUBD
>
Project Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/14/2025 12:42:25 PM
Creation date
10/14/2025 12:37:33 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
114
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TO: Walter R. Benson <br />FROM: Jeanne A. Mabusth <br />DATE: February 6, 1981 <br />SUBJECT: #589 James McCleary, 3'45 Bayside Road - <br />Preliminary Subdivision <br />Zoning District - LR-lA <br />Subdivision - 3 lot plat <br />Area - 2 acres (240 lineal feet of lakeshorel <br />The Planning Commission's review and approving recommendation <br />have been based on the standards and conditions set"orth in the <br />rezoning agreement for the Stubbs Bay Marina propert,�. (enclosed <br />in your packet) The 3 lot subdivision; followp all the guidelines <br />conceptually approved by Council durint, t4ic rezoning review as <br />follows: <br />1. Average lot area of 21,780 square `eet. - limit of three <br />residential lots. <br />2. Lot width 75 feet. <br />3. Outlot A designates separate parcel to provide lake access <br />for a property owner within 2000 feet. <br />4. All three lots r-parian to Lake Minnetonka and subiect <br />to all standards of the L.M.C.D. <br />Please review the Planning Commission minutes of December 1, <br />1980, and January 19, 1981, for background discussion and approving <br />recommendation. <br />Planning Commission's one concern was that a separate private <br />read outlot (20 feet width) affording access to 3 residential <br />lots should be designated within Outlot B. This designation will <br />clearly show all access must be via East Lake Street. <br />The plat should designate drainage and utility easements <br />along exterior and interior lot lines of Outlots A and B. <br />The applicant was not present at either of the two meetings. <br />All contact with applicant has been with staff over the phone. <br />The Planning Commission required a park dedicat;on fee because <br />the rezoning agreement did not: waive a park f- -jplicant states <br />that he is not required to pay park dedicatirn <br />The percolation testinn has not been submit because McCleary <br />plans to ask Council to waive that requirement. fie would prefer <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.