My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1988
>
12-12-1988 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/13/2025 1:24:02 PM
Creation date
10/13/2025 1:05:40 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
643
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1350 <br />November 16, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />The addition will also require a sidn setback variance from the new <br />division line from the north. The existing house on the south side is <br />approximately 21' from thn south lot line and the existing lakeshore garage <br />is approximately 3.6' from the lot line. If the applicants are asked to <br />meet the 30• setback at the northe,.st corner of the proposed addition, <br />20'8" wou.,.d not provide adequate ;. ' dth for a garage to function for two <br />stall use. <br />At an earlier meeting with the applicants, staff asked the Borns if <br />the addition could be moved closer to thc street as there appeared to be <br />adequate depth. The City would be more comfor*a'^' a approving a street <br />setback variance by reducing the severe lakeshore . -ack proposed at 17' <br />at the northwest corner of the addition. The appliGanL., advised that this <br />would not be a problem for the placement of the garage, but L•?cause <br />their desire to expand the living area of the limited first floor, it was <br />imperative that they align the addition with the existing lake side of the <br />house. <br />The survey has located the existing house on the south side in order <br />to determine if there would be a vis,.al impact on the lakeshore views. The <br />v or.sed addition will not encroach any closer into the lakeshore views of <br />the resident to the south. The Halper property was not included because of <br />the higher 241+ elevations. The Halpers will receive no visual impact from <br />the proposed addition on the orn property. The City has received no <br />negative comments from the ne.ghbors notified for this review. <br />Note the applicants' survey does not designa+ ilkway from the <br />garage to the existing front door ste^-�. The crusher adscaping around <br />the front steps has an url •rliner and would be considered a!q hardcover. <br />Review Exhibit A, note thi : specific area is out. of the 75' setback area. <br />The 75-250' setback area p- I•tod at 14% total hardcover would allow an <br />Increase for the 60 s.f. c shed landscape area and a walkway not to <br />-sceed a 4' width for a dial o` +*I' at 00 s.f. 'rl-;z 75-250' hardcover <br />facts should be adjusted to incl c -'ne additiona_ total of 140 s.f. of <br />hardcover. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.