Laserfiche WebLink
Tonka Lake Properties <br />1340 Baldur Park Road <br />September 9, 1982 <br />Page 2 <br />3. The City is in receipt of a letter of credit for $5,000 to insure <br />connection of the Olson home to City sewer with a deadline date of <br />November 1, 1982. If this deadline is to be met as Council required, <br />then work must begin no later than September 30, 1982. Engineered <br />plans for the extension of City sewer (existing house and two stubs <br />for Locs 2 & 3) must be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer <br />prior to construction. <br />4. The hardcover issue was never adequately addressed in the original <br />subdivision review. <br />a) Your Planner has the following comments: <br />Staff has a problem in reviewing this three -lot proposal for <br />potential hardcover. There is a loss of control over what <br />development may occur on each lot since, by ordinance, each lot is <br />viewed individually and can have up to 25% hardcover (outside <br />the 75' line). The common driveway hardcover excess is not <br />deductible against the lots. The potential is actually for <br />more hardcover in this three -lot design than was possible in <br />the last four -lot design. <br />Also, we have already had a potential purchaser of Lot 1 (the <br />existing house) ask about major additions only to find that <br />the proposed lot line locations restrict that lot so much as to <br />prevent almost any changes without setback and'or hardcover <br />variances, which we have said would not be approved. We suggested <br />a lot line change now if any changes to that house are really <br />expected. <br />What has happened is that the minimum area of Lot 1 is strung <br />out along the shoreline and driveway making this "area" <br />effectively unusable. Recause this existing house is mostly <br />within the 75' setback, designinq the lot lines as proposed <br />acts to ignor this existing hardcover encroachment while increasing <br />the lot area, and h,_nce, allowable hardcover for the two new lots. <br />For the above reasons, staff would still recommend a PRD-style <br />plat where each actual building env`lope is platted now, defining <br />for all time the actual extent of future construction and <br />hardcover. This is the only way actual buliding locations can <br />be defined and platted. The four -unit layout was turned down <br />because of excessive hardcover. Platting the PRD-style house <br />locations is the only way Council can effectively control <br />hardcover for the proposed threes -unit design. <br />