10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1321 September 2, 1988 Page 2 of 4 All access to these lots must be via the approved access corridor, depending upon the level and type of use proposed by the school district will determine the amount of necessary upgrading of road and type of road to be constructed during this interim period. As there are no formal plans proposed for the property by the school, except for possibly playing fields, the City will have to ask for assurance/confirmation that the road would be constructed based upon a certain development level of the property. A Developer's Agreement will be filed against the chain of title of each of the four lots, advising any future ownez of the need to install a road to the current engineering standards of the City if one of these lots is to be developed. The share in the cost of the road should be defined. This will be the subdivider's responsibility to define and develop as part of the restrictive language within the Developer's Agreement. The City must require assurance that the road would be constructed at the time of development (for the City is being asked to waive the requirement that engineering plans for road and road fees be filed at the time of the preliminary plat). The need for plans anal review fees should also be set forth in the Developer's Agreement. Review of RR-1B Standards - Each lot clearly satisfies the two acre dry contiguous standard and 200 feet lot width at the rear of the front yard setback line. All lots can be served in the future by an interior road not requiring additional curb cuts along old Crystal Bay Road or County Road 6. Depending upon the overall scheme of development in the future and the final ownership patterns of these parcels, an access road may be designed to the north connr =.cing outlot A -:ith County Road 6. In the original platting of this property wits, the crystal Crest plat, a l l road dedications were made, and all wetlands were designated. Staff sees no need for topographic information at this level of review. In review of the minutes, it was • noted that a Planning Commission Member suggested the need for topographic information. Staff has reviewed the location of the road outlot and sees no need for topographic information at this point of the review. The school district has advised the staff that a member of the board has been in contact with each member and has discussed the current plan and has also been advised that no other additional information will be needed to complete this review. The septic testing has been waived as the lots all exceed 5 acres of dry buildable area. Septic testing will be required at the time c-f development of each of the four lots.