Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1321 <br />September 2., 1988 <br />Page 3 of 4 <br />The school district should be placed on notice that with the formal <br />location of the through road, Outlot A, if a development application is <br />received for the property to the east, the City would have to address the <br />issue of a future through road to connect with the existing road Outlot A. <br />The future plans of the school district to vacate the road upon the final <br />acquisition of all four parcels, may not be feasible if development plans <br />to the east have been approved by the City. <br />Staff Recommendation - <br />To approve the four lot plat application of Tom Haislet, finding all <br />standards of the RR-1B zoning district and pertinent standards of the <br />subdivision regulations have been met. This approval is based on the <br />following conditions: <br />1. A Developer's Agreement shall be executed by the developer to <br />insure installation of a future road that must meet all future <br />engineering standards of the City at the time of construction. The <br />developer shall draft restrictions/covenants within that agreement <br />that will address the following concerns of the City: <br />A) Development or use of either one of the four lots, shall <br />require the installation of the through re--ddfrom the <br />intersection of Old Crystal Bay Road to the east border of Outlot <br />A. The developer may provide some clarification language <br />regarding the limited use by the school for play fields or other <br />activities not involving structural improvements. It should be <br />noted that access to play fields must be via the approved <br />corridor. The City Engineer shall define a standard of minimum <br />improvement for the temporary access road to the clay field. <br />B) A formula should be established providing guidelines for the <br />share in the cost in the total upgrading of Outlot A. <br />C) The agreement should also advise future owners that at the <br />time road plans are su'-.ritted, additional fees will be required <br />and appropriate security posted with the City in the form of a <br />letter of credit to assure that road is completed to required <br />standards. How shall these costs be shared? <br />2. Payr*ent of a park Fee in the amount of $400.00 ($100.00 per each <br />lot). The Planning Commission may recommend to waiving payment of <br />park fee at this level of development. <br />3. To waive the road fee and engineering plans for road usually <br />required at the time of a subdivision application, because of the <br />unique circumstances surrounding this subdivision application and the <br />fact that the Developer's Agreement will address the need for fee <br />payments and appropriate security to insure completion of road at the <br />time development pressures require construction of road in the future. <br />No <br />