10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1306 July 13, 1988 Page 2 of 3 List of Exhibits A - Appl:.cation B - Property Owner's List C - Plat Map D - Cook Letter E - MWCC Letter to City F - MWCC Letters to Tobermann G - Site Plan H - Fee Title Purchase Sketch plus Description I - Perpetual Access Easement and Temporary Construction Easement Sketch and Description J - Elevation of Lift Station K - Site Plan/Profile Lift Static:, 44 Approved in Appl. 1256 Re-iew of Current Application - As Applicants addendums E and F advise, the original proposal for an underground valve vault and pump station had to be discarded in place of current proposed pumping station/lift station 32, x 20'. The current owner of the marina did n,)t wish the r.,drina property to be cluttered at the soutY east corner of tha property and asked that it be placed in the southwest corner of the residential property adjacent to the marina property. Mr. Toberman has a contract for deed for the property with the current owner Mrs. Straley. The stricture will be approximately 11 feet high, located 20 feet from the residence tha.: is now located on the same property. The MWCC plans to remove the current gray structure in a serious state of disrepair, addressed at 3280 North Shore Drive, and will relocate the present resident's in another facility. For the review of the current application, Planning Commission has but two standards to review: j.. That the subject public service structure must be located 50 feet from residential. zor d property. 2. That than architectural design of the service structare be compatible with the neighbothond in which it is to be located. The difficult;, for this review is that the subject area is scher'uled for change in use and charge in zoning so that the current residential will be phased out. Is the 32' x 20' brick structure with an 11 foot height compatible with either the B2 or residential neighborhood? The staff would note that the current site plan does not show landscaping as the other site plans provided in An�,Iication N1256. The staff would suggest that the MWCC provide landscaping adjacent to the structure. Care should be given so that any landscaping proposed around the structure not create a view problem with access to the County Road. In the process o` reviewing the application with the Ci'y Engineer, the staff questioned the need for fee ownership. Indeed, if fee ownership was need..,4 f or parcel that the building is to rest upc: , ' hen we are dea 1 i na very uefinitely with a subdivision of the property. The entire parcel consists of 30,300 sq. ft. and the parcel to be divided off is 2,880 sq.