10-10-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Zoning File # 1306 July 13, 1988 Page Three of Three ft. Glen spoke with Kimberly Eckhardt of the MWCC and she advised that an easement could serve them temporarily and then file `or the subdivision later in the month. Glen also advised Ms. Eckhardt tha = the City would not feel obligated to approve a future subdivision of a substandard lot because of the original and earlier approval of the project over the easement area. Ms. Eckhardt followed up with a call direct to me the following da"•, advising that the attorneys of the MWCC noted that fee ownership was nece.,sary for this type of structure. Ms. Eckhardt will file a Subdivision application with the City. A public hearing would be scheduled for the August 15th meeting. The current Zoning District requires half an acre in area, or 21,780 sq. ft. Upon division of the land, the remaining property would consist of 27,420 sq. ft. The real issue for the subdivision will be the creation of the 2,880 sq. £t. parcel containing the lift station. The MWCC may be asked t-) execute special agreements wit:, the City that upon vacation of, or disuse of the structure that they would be responsible for removing the structure and that said land must be returned bark to the original underlying fee ownership. Such a resolution would deem the subject parcel unbuildable and for the exclusive use of the lift station by the MWCC. Ms. Eckhardt ha., been advised that we would require a formal plat of the property. Staff Recoa endation - The staff would suggest that the Planning Commiss4 table all action on the current Conditional Use Permit until th subdivision application is presented a` the public hearing for the August 15th meeting; then proceed with comprehensive action on both applications. The MWCC repre --ntative should be advised at your July 18th meeting as to Planning Commission members' concerns regarding either the proposed location, design, setbacks, etc., of the proposed Conditional Use Permit for the lift station and any other concerns not cite' b_ staff regarding the proposed suL"ivision. The timing of this project is n,,st important to the MWCC and any unnecessary delays may iiapede the commencement of the project this year 1. In regard to the Conditional Use P _mit f, the station, the Planning Commission may wish to relocate the structure more _.,an 5 feet off of the designated right-of-way of the County Poad. Applicant should be asked why it has been placed feet, although actually 40 feet from the traveled road right-of-way. 2. Should the parcel be larger and deeper providing a greater building envelope for the structure? A Landscape Plan should certainly be provided for our August 15th Rt. 1. 3. what about parxrng needs for this structure - how often will persons be responsible -or. visiting the site. Parking area has not hee- defined on the site plan? 4. Any other comments of the Planning Commission.