Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #1318 <br />Additional Comments and Planning Commission Recommendation <br />September 22, 1988 <br />Page 3 of 3 <br />A member of the Planning Commission asked the applicant if a 3h' high <br />gate would not serve the same purpose as a 8' high gate. The applicant <br />advised that he did not feel it would have the same lmpac`.. Other members <br />concurrered with the applicant agreeing ti►,-` in their exc_.rience the higher <br />gate structure provide a more formidable, defined presence, to deter <br />unauthorized vehicular traffic from entering the property. One member felt <br />that gate structures should not be included with standards for fences and <br />walls and felt that they required separate standards and added t}%at the <br />safety/vision factor was more pertinent with the consideration of such <br />structures. <br />The r:.anning Commission voted unanimously to approve the plans as <br />presented by the applicant and adopted the staff recommendation noted <br />above. The enclosed resolution has been drafted per the Planning <br />Commission's approval recommendation. <br />or <br />