Submittal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988 ZONING PILE i1311 CONTINUED asked applicants if they would prefer tabling this matte- so they could present a rev'sed plan at a later meeting? Applicants wanted the Planning Commission to vote on the matter as currently proposed. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1312 WILLIA14 J. LAUER 3165 NORTH SHORE DRIVE VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:25 P.M. - 8:30 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Applicant was present for this matter. Zoning Administrator. Mabusth stated that the applicant was seeking approval for a hardcover variance for an addition that will not encroach in the average lakeshore setback or 75' lakeshore setback areas. The variance would allow a 1.89% hardcover increase in the 75-250' setback area. The project will not require major excavation or land alterations. Bellows asked for readable plans. Mabusth stated that the sketch s4howing t11e proposal was staff's sketch. An updated sLrvey showing the driveway was not submitted with the application. Bellow;; admonished the Zoning Department for accepting incomplete plans. Applicant stated that he was not aware that the City required any further information. Mabusth noted for both applicant and Commission members that the land use application clearly states that a survey is required. Kelley suggested revising the variance application. He wanted to change item 14 under "Required Submittals" to include the language *current and proposed". Mr. Lauer stated that he had revier.ed the staff's drawings and felt that they were correct. Mabusth stated that the applicant showed 245 s.f. more hardcover than staff's calculations. Johnson asked if the 1.89% hardcover increase was based upon staff's calculations? Mabusth stated that the percentage was based upon applicant's calculations, staff's percentage was less. There were no comments from the public regarding this matter and the public hearing was closed. It was moved by Cohen, seconded by Moos, to recommend approval of i1312, per staff's recommendations and option B regarding conditions of approval. Cohen asked Mabusth what percentage of hardcover needed to be removed from the 250-500' zone. Mabusth stated that applicant could remove 1.89% hardcover by removing accessory structures in the 250-500' zone. Mabusth asked applicant if he was familiar with the language preceded with an asterik that stated that the hardcover variance was 10