Submittal - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING HELD AUGUST 15, 1988 ZONING FILE i1312 CONTINUED needed even though applicant was maintaining the same amount of hardcover. This was because applicant was proposing new construction in the 75-250' setback area and the setback area already exceeded the allowed 25 % of hardcover. Kelley placed applicant on notice that there could be no additional hardcover in the 75-250' zone other than what had been approved. Motion, Ayes=6, Nays=0, Motion passed. #1313 RICHARD ELLER 2655 SHADYWOOD ROAD VARIANCE PUBLIC HEARING 8:30 P.M. - 8:45 P.M. The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. Applicant was present for this matter. Assistant Planning & Zoning Administrator Gaffron Explained that the applicant was requesting some changes to his existing patio rrea. Currently there is a second story deck over a grade - level concrete patio. Applicant's proposal involves removal of the entire second story deck and construction of a 4' wide walkway at the upper level along the lakeside of the house that would connect to a new Beck above a new screen porch. He would also construct a grade -level wood deck over the existing concrete patio. Kelley asked if there woc:ld actually be a reduction in hardcover? Gaffron stated depending upon the Planning Commission's decision, there could be a small decrease or a net trade --off in the total amount of hardcover. Bellows asked if applicant was proposing a screen porch or a 3-season porch. Applicant asked for a clarification as to what differentiated one from the other. Bellows stated that a screen porch would not be closed in with storm windows, it would remain open. Applicant stated that he would be building a 3-season porch. Gaffron explained that the difference between the Purdy and Eller applications was that the Purdy application called for a new addition encroaching toward the lake. The Ellers are proposing to reduce the existing upper level deck and build a porch directly underneath it. !Bellows stated that what applicar:r is proposing is an aesthetic improvement. Kelley concurred wlL`- thiF and asked whether the net increase in hardcover in the 0-75' was in fact 128 s.f. Gaffron stated that was correct. Applicant said that he would not .increase the hardcover if that was the request of the Planning Commission. Kelley stated that he would like applicant to decrease the hardcover percentage. There were no conuneni m the public regarling this matter and the public hearing ed. 11