04-25-1988 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1233 March 16, 1988 Page 2 Section 10.55, Subd. 8 - Variance to place new structures and perform land alterations within protected area. Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 21(2) - Ordinance 24, Second Series - Conditional use permit required if fill brought to site exceeds 100 cubic yards if this fill is not required for adequate coverage of frost fo,)tings/foundation. Fill Brought Onto Site - Section 10.03, Subd. 19 and 21(2), Ordinance 24, Second Series - Applicant will not require a conditional use permit for fill brought onto the site. Applicant has submitted plans showing that the proposal does not fall into the guidelines for unusual land alteration. The revised plan (Exhibit K 6 O) is a major change from the proposed plan first received. Conditional Use Permit/Variance - Land alteration within 75' of lakeshore. Applicant is requesting to install a 6" PVC pipe within 75' of the lakeshore setback (Exhibit M). Applicant is requesting this drainage pipe to remove drainage water from an area with an elevation of 945.5. This area is the lowest on the property outside the 75' setback (see Exhibit- O). This low area is created to maintiain a walkout style house, as stated in staff memo 12-16-87 (Exhibit E). The City Engineer's review is not available cc the time of this report, but will be si. emitted to you at the Plani:ing Commission meeting. Conditional Use Permit - Retaining walls within 75' of lakeshore. Section 10.55, Subd. 8. Applicant is requesting to restore his retaining wall within the 75' setback. These retaining walls must be replaced as it is olu and deteriorated and the condition was worsened by the July 23, 1987 storm (Exhibit L). The applicant is proposing to remove the concrete block wa)1 and replace it with natural stone (Exhibit L). This retaining wall is two tiers high. The lower wall is approximately 65', and the upper wall is approximately 95'. The existing stairs will be removed and new stairway is proposed in the center of the retaining walls. Staff has inspected the site and found that the existir.q retaining walls are in an unsafe condition. Staff Reco� ndation - Staff recommends the following: