Resolution 1298 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

� ` Cit� of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL • NO. �2yS� • - • • a) Orono and Mr. Burar_dt agreed that sewer service to Areas #2, 4 & 5 was consistent with the statements and plans contained within Orono' s interim CSPP, and within our 1980 CMP and CSPP. This was why MWCC had approved service to these areas. b) Orono and Mr. Burna.dt agreed that Orono would amend our MUSA line designation to include Areas # 4 & S within the urban service area. Orono agreed to do this because: 1) Areas # 4 & 5 are developed to urban densities, including some duplex and commercial occupancies, whereas Area #2 is not. 2) Areas #4 & 5 are physically contiguous to and extensior�s of the adjacent urban � service area that includes the City of tiv'ayzata, whereas Area #2 is isolated from , any urban service area. �) �reas #4 & 5 include a few undeveloped vacant lots which could be developed if sewer was available ar_d urban develop- ment standards were applied, whereas Area #2 has no such development potential. c) Orono and Mr. Burandt appeared to agree that Area #2 would continue to be designated as part of the rural service area. This is consistent with the MWCC letter of January 12 , 1981. 20. After the February 3, 1981, meeting, Orono responded on March 10, 1981, to Chairman Weaver with a letter out- lining the agreements with Mr. Burandt, including our intention to designate Areas #4 & 5 urban, and Area #2 rural . 21. On March, 16 , 1981, and in response to Orono ' s March 10, 1981, letter, MWCC Chief Administrator, George Lusher wrote Chairman Weaver regarding these m�tters. His point no. 2 states "Area no. 2 as shown on Figure No. 13 has had sanitary sewer service installec� as part of a recent City improvement project. For this reason, this area should be included caithin the 199U MU��1 1 ine . " � S oF 12