Resolution 1298 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

• � Clt� of ORONO RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL � NO. /�9� � _ . .. ,. ,, � ��) T��ote that Area #2 on Map l3 (Expected Sewer 1'acility Improvement Map) is the same as r�rea #4 on Map 12 (Rural Housing Cluster Identification Map) . b) Orono had just agreed to designate Area � a on Map 12 as urban. This letter was viewed as confirmation of this fact. 22 . Following receipt of the Orono letter of March 10, 1981, and the MWCC letter of March 16 , 1981, Chairman Weaver wrote Orono on March 20, 1981, that the additional informa- tion received by the Metropolitan Council was found ade- quate to complete review of Orono' s CMP. 23. The question of Urono designating Area #2 on Map 12 as rural did not reappear until Orono received a c�py of the preliminary staff draft of the PDC report on May 29, 1981. 24 . On June 9, 1981, Orono staff reviewed the preliminary . i�DC report with Metro Council and b2WCC staff. The result of this meeting was a revision of the preliminary report and additional comments by D4etro staff when the Orono c:MP was reviewed by the Physical Development Committee. 25. A memo by Bob Ma�anec to the Physical Development Comsnittee dated June 24, 1981, seems to explain the situation as follows: a) "The question of how to desicnate Stuc�y Area fi�2 is not a major issue . No plan modification is required at this point. " b) The staff was concerned with an "apparent incon- sistency'" within the Orono CMP because we indicate two urban islands elsewhere in the City, yet state that we do not want to designate Area #2 as an urhan island. c) The staff was concernecl that a special exception must be made to Water Quality Management Policy Plan Policy 7 . d} The staff was "anxious to resolve this apparent inconsistency i� order to avoid setting a precedent that might be misinterpreted in other, more serious instances. " • f; o� 12