Laserfiche WebLink
Resolution No . /�9� . � <br /> � Page 82 <br /> S. Most respondents favored less than full scale <br /> commercial marina use of the property, either as <br /> residential or as limited marina, but not as large _ <br /> a scale as proposed by McCleary or Johnson. � <br /> 6, All respondents agreed that some action n�ed be <br /> taken by the City Council and the marina property <br /> • o-�aner to improve the appearance of the marina property <br /> by cutting weeds, removal of debris and institution <br /> of regular maintenance procedures . ' <br /> C. PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNS � <br /> 1. The Planning Co�unission was divided on the question <br /> � . of ultimate land use for the Marina property and therefore <br /> � submitted individual member opinions rather than one <br /> opinion from the Commission as a whole. The individual <br /> , . responses were not as effective as would have been one <br /> unified recommendation. 'I'he varying opinions did serve <br /> • to remind the Council that the issues were indeed <br /> complex, that answers were not easy, that decisions . <br /> were not predictable. <br /> 2. Taken individually, the Planning Commission <br /> . recommendations cover the same spectrum of alternatives <br /> - and concerns as did those of the general public, <br /> - including the recommendation that some action, .some <br /> decision is necessary to improve the appearance of <br /> the�pr'operty. . <br /> � 3. The most influential portions of the various <br /> Planning Commissioners comments and recommendations <br /> � were those discussions �concerning environmental/neighbor- <br /> hood/traffic/societal issues . These basic planning <br /> � c5ncerns help uncover facts and direct attention toward <br /> � � optimum land use alternatives. � <br /> • �� <br />