My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
11-13-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/4/2025 12:47:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
11/13/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/4/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMIRSION FETING OCTOBER 16, 1989 <br />ZONING FIW' #1470-PARTEN CONTINUED <br />Planning Commissioner Hanson again questioned whether it <br />would be possible to crate 3 lots of satisfactory <br />characteristics. <br />MrE . Parten suygest.ed that due to the low density in this <br />are,- overall, that per-h%ps the grinting of a variance would not <br />LE: L,:reasonable. <br />Planniny Commissioner Cohen indicated that he would be <br />willing to consider varian ie approval prop :ded that the applicant <br />pu. :•aase Mrs. Styles ,.25 acre, and include it in the <br />subdivision. <br />Kelley suggested that in addition to providing access to the <br />4.25 parcel, that access be given to the other existing land <br />!Dcked parcels in the northeast corner. <br />Mr. Parten questioned whet' would be required to have a <br />paved road? <br />Chairman Kelley suggested that the Iomeowners current,y <br />achieving access via the L► Line that would benefit from the <br />construction of the road pay a share of the cost. <br />The question ahose as to whether those residents actually <br />Lad do easement from the DNR tc cross the Luce Li <br />Planninq Commissioner Cohen suggested that the applicant <br />investigate that further and bring the information `ack at a <br />:`_er time. <br />Chairman Kelley indica}el that he would favor a 3-lot P <br />with access to the 4.25 acre lot and the other 2 !anelcck <br />properties. <br />Planning Commissions. Johnson said *-hat the iss•-Ies <br />nncern are the location of r.nE: alternate drainfield site for 1, <br />1, access to the rema-r _ 'ma's and the questier, of whether a <br />PRD is the best way tt- _ Jcatd. He said that he would re n.ore <br />likely to a -)Ye a lot size variance. <br />Planning Commissi. cr Cohen cony- i -c ed with Joh! son. <br />Planning Commi:siooner Het low-- agreed with <br />prt-fere ice. <br />Planning Commissioner e:rown concurred with <br />oel lows, and felt - ` - ..s imf _ 7tant to. further inve ,• <br />eas-ement tot cross:no ` the Luce Line. <br />Pl nine Con .ssic-o- Hanson a. C with Kel lrt- li:- <br />Plannin; Commissioner Moo M..-'d ac tt• t she too had conQersi <br />about the location ,-f ths.ai• erc,at, drams -field site. <br />1 RTC' e. •r+!..�«.• .+.•y R+•yt �� . .. .. •_ - •._'?r "'i- . �.. . ..a...�. w•y+!+�.• _ w-• � _s.p�.�!w++�.�,,"!11..: <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.