My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
10-23-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/1/2025 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/23/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/1/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Page Two <br />BERM PLEASE ASK FOR A MORE DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE BERM WHICH <br />IS PLANNED NORTH OF COUNTY ROAD 6. <br />The County said on September 25 that there will be a "berm" <br />in place north of County Road 6 "in order to protect the <br />residents." What is a berm? The word, "berm," conjures in <br />most people's minds a sight or sound barrier. If the bei.n is <br />nothing more than a 6" curb, then "curb" is the word that <br />should be used so that people are not misled. How can a berm <br />which is only 6 ft. wide be built high enough to be a sight <br />or sound barrier? <br />SKETCH OF EACH BEFORE PRELIMINARY APPROVAL IS GIVEN, EACH PROPERTY OWNER <br />PROPERTY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED WITH A SKETCH OF HOW HIS/HER PROPERTY <br />*.ILL BE AFFECTED. THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO HAVE COPIES OF THE <br />SKETCHES ALSO. <br />The total right of way will be 80 feet; however, considerable <br />grading and destruction will take place in the "construction <br />area" beyond the right of way, thus causinq extensive damac» <br />to personal property. <br />The need for a sketch for each property owner was very <br />apparent at the September 25 meeting when Mrs. Mathewson of <br />900 North Willow stated county personnel had told her that <br />she would lose five trees; when she any flier nephew checked it <br />out on her property, they discovered she would be losing <br />twelve trees. <br />While the County will "restore" the construction area beyond <br />the right of way, it's obvious they cannot restore 50-year <br />old trees. Their idea of restoring is to scatter grass seed <br />or lay sod, which then becomes the responsibility of the <br />property owner to keep watering. The loss of trees and <br />bushes, which provide sight and sound barriers, considerably <br />decreases the market value of property along a busy road. <br />The sketch for each property must indicate clearly 0— <br />distance from the center of the present road to th <br />distance point in the construction area. The pr,.!;,t road <br />center provides a point of reference for the property owner. <br />Such a sketch will allow the property owner and the Council <br />to fully understand how each person's property will be <br />affected. Blanket approvals (without sketches) are not fair <br />to the property owners. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.