My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-23-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
10-23-1989 - Agenda Packet City Council - regular meeting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2026 10:57:01 AM
Creation date
8/1/2025 1:40:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Administration
Admin Doc Type
Agenda Packet City Council
Section
City Council
Subject
regular meeting
Document Date
10/23/1989
Retention Effective Date
8/1/2025
Retention
Permanent After File Date
Protection
Public
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
October 20, 1989 <br />Dear Orono Council Members: <br />There are several aspects of County Road 116 which I believe the Orono Council <br />needs to examine before preliminary approval is given to Hennepin County. <br />Because the road will impact on many Orono residents, it's impurtant that you <br />and the residents fully understand what you are being asked to approve. <br />THE MAP Please insist that the County have a map that the Council and <br />the audience can 5eg and interpret. <br />SPEED LIMIT THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT WILL BE 45 M.P.H. UNDER WHAT <br />CONDITIONS WOULD THE POSTED SPEED LIMIT BE INCREASED? <br />In a meeting with County personnel, Medina residrnt� were <br />told that the design speed would be 45 m.p.h. U,-• that the <br />posted speed limit would later be increased vi:: a formula <br />based on the speed that 85% of the traffic is actually <br />traveling. This means thP.t the more the traffic is speeding, <br />the higher the revised speed limit will be set. In fairness <br />to the affected Orono property owners and because of the <br />short distance, the Council should insist that the County <br />agree in advance that the posted speed limit will ntver be <br />any higher than 40 m.p.h. between Highway 12 and County Road <br />6. <br />TRAFFIC COUNT THE COUNTY INDICATED AT THE SEPTEMBER 25 MEETING THAT THE <br />TRAFFIC COUNT ON WILLOW DRIVE BETWEEN HIGHWAY 12 AND COUNTY <br />ROAD 6 WAS 1400/DAY IN 19R7, AND THAT IT WILL INCREASE TO <br />3,000/DAY IN 2010. WHAT BILL THE TRAFFIC COUNT BE IN 1992, <br />TWO YEARS AFTER THE ROAD IS COMPLETED? <br />The County makes references to traffic counts far in the <br />future in order to allay the immediate fears of the <br />residents. The traffic count will in fact jump immediately <br />upon completion in 1991. The rr... ncil and the residents need <br />to know what those projection '.gures are for 1992. <br />DO THE TRAFFIC COUNT PROJECTIONS FOR 1992 AND 2010 ASSUME <br />THERE WILL BE A STOP LIGHT 1N PLACE AT HIGHWAY 12? <br />This is very important. If the projection figures not <br />include the assumption of affic light --but if there i in <br />fact a stop light in place ien the traffic volume will be <br />much higher than their projections. That needs to be <br />clarified. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.