Laserfiche WebLink
City Of ORONO <br />RESOLUTION Or' THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. 2219 <br />iique character of the heavily wooded, and steep <br />property has required special consideration by the City in <br />with road design and lot development. <br />sloped <br />dealinc <br />8. Lot 2 does not meet the required lot widtY. to the rear of the <br />front yard setback line, the applicants have asked the City tc <br />consider the fo- .owing hardships: <br />a) the need to preserve adequate areas in building envelopes of <br />adjacent lots; <br />b) minimize tree removal; <br />c) provide feasible grades for drives to house locations. <br />9. Lots 1, 2, 4 and 5 shall be served by a private road that has beer <br />designed to minimize the impact of the construction but yet provide e <br />safe use level for the -,:blic. Lot 3 shall achieve access via ar <br />existing private drive which wil- also minimize the impact on the <br />property. <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based upon either one or morf <br />of the f inding , noted abz)ve, the City Council oft the City of Orono hereb, <br />api.ro,,- the preliminary plat application of John D. McDowell and T.,.' <br />Markle, Vice President of Woodhill Country Club per plat drawing by Thoma. <br />S. Bergquist dated June 26, 1987 and further grants a variance to th, <br />-,tandard that woul�2 require all lots have frontage on a public road wit} <br />the creation of the private road and usu of private e-iveway and pe: <br />:section 10.02, Definition 77, grants a width variance t.- Lot 2 because th( <br />lot does not meet the required 200 feet width at rear of required fron' <br />yard, subject to the following condi*ions: <br />1. Prior to the issuance of building perm.�ts for new construction <br />the final plat must be filed with either the Hennepin•. Count <br />Recorder's Office or Registrar of Titles Office, road base install - <br />and approved by City, and, if required improvements are not completed <br />the developers must execute a developer's agreement and post a lette <br />of credit (150% of cost of remaining improvements). <br />2. Required improvements: <br />a) Woodhill Avenue - The improvement of Woodhill Avenue shall b- <br />( completed as a public project. Developer;'applicant shall execut, <br />r an agreement that will affirm his/their share in the cost of sai( <br />road improvement. City to determine the amount of the paymen- <br />upon receipt of final costs for said road improvement. Woodhi1' <br />Avenue shall be upgraded from ? 6 feet minimum pared width to a 2: <br />feet minimum paved width. <br />b; Private road to be constructed per standards s,-�tforth it <br />Section 11.33, Subdivision 4 and 5 for rc id serving 3-6 lot! <br />except for changes in design recormne-.ded by City Engineer in hi. - <br />letter of Juiy 16, 1997 an `ached tc this resolution. <br />Page - 4 <br />