Laserfiche WebLink
Jan Gibson <br />% Norwest Mortgage <br />March 22, 1985 <br />Page 3 <br />per 2 square feet of bottom area. . . . <br />0.6 x 600 s.f. x 1 x 1 GPD = 120 GPD <br />1.5 2 s.f. <br />Under these assumptions, the system would be capable of handling 120 <br />gallons per day. <br />Now, I haven't even touched on the variability of water use among <br />families with dissimilar habits. I know of families of 4 that use <br />only 100 gallons per day total, or 25 GPD/per person. I also know of <br />a family of 10 in Orono whose average water use rate for the period <br />July 1983 to January 1985 was over 110 gallons per day per person. <br />Which typical family is moving into 65 Cygnet P1,ce? How many gallons <br />per day will they use? Is a 120 gallon per day system adequate for <br />them? It apparently was for the last family in the house, since we <br />have no record or evidence of past problems with the system, yet we <br />did on the most recent inspection note that the system appearAd over - <br />full; we can only surmise that this is due to any of a number of <br />factors - totally saturated soils at the present time, a plugged tank <br />outlet pipe, or maybe very low acceptance due to natural biomat build- <br />up, or . . . .? <br />I recommended that the tanks be pumped, which they now have been, <br />which will give the drainfield a chance to recover a bit. I do not <br />believe that this pumpout will have a long term effect on the <br />continued functioning of the system, but should ensure that a new <br />owner starts out with relatively solids -free tanks. The two tanks <br />appear to be 1000-plus and 750 gallons in capacity respectively. It <br />is impossible without digging them up and removing the covers to tell <br />whether the baffle:, are still in place. It appears they do not have <br />solid bottoms and are probably subject to some interference by <br />seasonal saturation. Current codes for a new house would require <br />sealed, precast 1-piece tanks rather than these site -built tanks which <br />are not sealed. To summarize, they will likely continue to function <br />but not as well as new tanks would. <br />Within the City of Orono are about 1,050 septic systems. Roughly <br />80% of these were installed (or still use components that were <br />installed) prior to 1978, when the code changed to require soil test- <br />ing and up-to-date system design, construction and maintenance -tan- <br />dards. However, the code does recognize "grandfathered" systems, and <br />where an existing substandard system is still functional and does not <br />create a healtr_ safety or welfare problem or an unsanitary condition <br />or pollution hazard, we do not require upgrading of the system except <br />to add the necessary tank inspection pipes. <br />