Laserfiche WebLink
Jan Gibson <br />% Norwest Mortgage <br />March 22, 1985 <br />Page 2 <br />Assuming a percolation rate range of 30-45 minutes per inch, <br />typical of these soils, a trench drainfield system should hav c about 2 <br />square feet of absorption area per gallon of wastewater per day, <br />according to standard design criteria. For a new house today, the <br />design rate of water use is 75 gallons per person per day, 2 people <br />per bedroom. For this 4 bedroom house: <br />2 s.f./GPD x 2 people/Br x 4 Br x 75 GPD/persor. <br />equals 1200 square feet drainfield in trenches no more than 3' wide. <br />The system serving the existing house was not well documented <br />when it was installed. Through probing the drainfield, we are able to <br />discern 2 drainfield lines apparently 60' in length and 5' in width, <br />for a total drainfield area of about 600 square feet. Note that in a <br />"bed" configuration, i.e. with trenches exceeding 3' in width, the U. <br />of M. Extension Service personnel are now recommending that the re- <br />quired drainfield area be increased by 50% when beds are used, hence <br />by most current thinking, this house should have 1200 x 1.5 or 1800 <br />square feet of drainfield bed. It appears to have 1/3 that amount. <br />What condition is this drainfield in? An absolute determination <br />would require excavating the beds, in effect destroying them. We can <br />make some assumptions, however. Since the amount of cover over the <br />beds is 2-2 1/2', which is unusually deep by today's standards, and <br />based on the assumed soil types described above and the topography of <br />this specific site we can probably expect that the seasonal zones of <br />saturation are very shallow and may surround the beds during wet <br />seaons of the year. This seasonal saturation, depending on duration, <br />may serve to allow the biomat inside the trenches to build up at an <br />annual rate greater than its natural rate of degradation; hence the <br />trenches tend to accumulate biomat (the characteristic black "sludge") <br />and eventually drastically reduce the trench capability to accept <br />effluent. We should probably assume, based on these saturated soils <br />probably being present, that the existing system after 11 1/2 years is <br />working at less than peak efficiency, especially during wet seasons of <br />the year. What % of efficiency? There is no practica' method of <br />determining this. <br />Having read this far, you are undoubtedly wondering when I'm <br />going to get to the point. My point is, it is impossible to make an <br />accurate determination of the conditon of a system without making <br />numerous assumptions and inferences, some of which may be correct and <br />others not correct. <br />For instance, if we assume that the system 1­.60% of its "peak <br />efficiency", and if we assume that it actuall; 'A)Fs have 600 square <br />feet of drainfield bed area, and if we reduce the jomewhat because of <br />the Extension Service recommendations, and if we assume a percolation <br />rate of 30-45 minutes per inch which translates-f6—T-GPD acceptance <br />