My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1985-03-22 Letter, Condition of Septic System
Orono
>
Property Files
>
Street Address
>
C
>
Cygnet Place
>
65 Cygnet Place - 04-117-23-22-0008
>
Septic
>
1985-03-22 Letter, Condition of Septic System
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/2/2025 1:27:56 PM
Creation date
7/2/2025 1:22:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
x Address Old
House Number
65
Street Name
Cygnet
Street Type
Place
Address
65 Cygnet Place
PIN
0411723220008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Jan Gibson <br />% Norwest Mort -gage <br />March 22, 1985 <br />Page 4 <br />I will try to briefly summarize for you: <br />A) The existing tanks appear to be substandard but functional. <br />They are of adequate capacity. We do not know whether the <br />baffles are still in place. The baffles should be checked <br />regularly (at each pumpout) as they are a critical part of the <br />system. Since the tanks are not sealed, they may be affected by <br />groundwater during wet seasons. <br />B) The drainfield appears to be substandard but functional. If <br />it was not functional, we would see evidence of sewage at the <br />ground surface or backups would have occurred in the house. We <br />have no way of knowing whether bac?ups have occurred in the <br />house. <br />C) We can surmise that the drainfield may be capable of <br />accepting up to 300 gallons per day of wastewater under dry soil <br />conditions, but may accept only 120 GPD or less under saturated <br />conditons. Since the private well is not metered, we have no <br />idea how much water the previous owners used. We cannot <br />accurately surmise the actual amount of water future owners will <br />use. <br />D) The City has little evidence to suggest that this system is <br />in a failing state, hence, unless it does fail by causing <br />discernible sanitary or pollution problems, we will not require <br />it to be upgraded. Orono does not have a hous-ng code requiring <br />upgrading at the time of a sale. <br />I realize that this treatise has been rather tedious, but it's <br />intent is to illustrate that "adequate" may have many meanings. Based <br />on current standards for a new house, the system is not adequate. <br />But, based on standards in effect at the time of construction and <br />based on the apparent functionality of the system, it is adequate <br />enough that I could not justify through my ordinances requiring that <br />it be upgraded. If a future owner produces amounts of wastewater <br />exceeding the unknown capability of the system, we could expect that <br />the system would become inadequate. <br />Please contact me at 473-7357 if you have any questions. <br />Sincerely, <br />i <br />Michael P. Gaffton, <br />Assistant Zoning Administrator <br />MPCA Inspector Cert. No. 00516 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.