07-10-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1405 May 11, 1989 Page 3 of 5 A. Options; 1. Realignment of lot line between lots 2 and 1 so that principal structure can meet 30' setback - applicant to be advised that if the bu.iJding permit for principal structure has not been issued within one year from the date of final plat approval, that accessory structure must be removed; OR 2. Realign lot line so that accessory structure is located within Lot 2 meeting the minimum 10' setback from the side lot line. B. Grant a width variance for Lot 1 measuiing approximately 145' at the 50' setback line rather than 200' (hardship - shape of lot, houses will not be located within the substandard lot width area). Future owner of Lot 1 should be advised that driveway must be 26' from iesigneted wetland within northwest portion o£ property. Access - The City will ask for dedication of right-of-way for County Road 51 and 84 as shown on the plat. Applicant proposes a new single access to Lot 1 via County Road 84 and a 5»hared access for Lots 2 and 3 via County Road 51. Granting an access easement to an interior lot weald not be consistent with :he City's previous actions on similar applications. Applicants lave always been asked to provide either a flag lot or an outlot for shared use and/or ownership. The area of the outlot or driveway easement must be excluded from the lot area. This will require reconfirmation of the dry buildable area vi :hin Lot 3. The shared lot line between Lots 1 and 3 will have to be moved further north. Lot 3 already contains 2.488 acres. It is imperative that the shared driveway tenidin in he same location because of the septic test site areas. Any chc nge or expansion in driveway access through this area will negate septic testing already performed on Lot 3. Gaffron cautions because the slopes become more severe as you move eastward, the more gentle sloped areas to the west and north of Lot 3 must be preserved for septic use. O tint*