05-08-1989 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Zoning File #1396 April 14, 1989 Page 4 of 6 2. S 10.41, Subdivision 7 (A) 1 & 3 - Variance. 3. S 10.41, Subdivision 10 (D) - Lakeshore hardcover regulations - variance. 4. S 10.41, Subdivision 10 (E) - Tree removal regulations - var. ::e. Based on the following findings: 1. The proposal has taken into consideration and improved the drainage on the lot. 2. The proposal has taken into consideration existing trees and tried to save as many as possible. 3. Due to terrain, location of proposal is only area acceptable. 4. That the proposal under which it would be operated and maintained would not be detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare or maternally injurious to properties or improvements in the vacinity. 5. The proposal is in accord with the objects of the zoning chapter and the purpose of the district in which the site is located and the Comprehensive Municipal Plan. CoBBercial Site Plan Review - Zoning District - B-2, lakeshore business district. Parking - Municipal Code requires that this type of use to provide parking as follows: 6 parking spaces shall be provided per each 10 boat slips. Applicant is proposing 68 spaces which meets the Municipal Code requirements. Applicant is showing the parking area as gravel surface. After reviewing this with the City Engineer, because of run-off and drainage, staff is requesting that all parking lots be covered with asphalt (see Exhibit L). Access — The City Engineer has revlev^d this project and had no comments on the access. After speaking with Hennepin County Department of Transportation, they requested that the access to the property be paved but had no problem with the access location (they also requested that the parking lot be paved). I have spoken with Hennepin County about a crosswalk in this area. A Mr. Wayne Matsumoto is in charge of this type of project and has not been able to contact me at this time.