My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-08-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
05-08-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/14/2025 11:56:02 AM
Creation date
4/14/2025 11:52:40 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
473
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Zoning File #1396 <br />April 14, 1989 <br />Page 3 of 6 <br />0-75 * Hardcoveri <br />Maximum Allowed « 0% <br />Area - 165,330 s.f. <br />Existing Hardcover ■ <br />Proposed Hardcover * <br />23,390 s.f. or 14.1% <br />25,609 s.f. or 15.48% <br />75-250* Hardcover: <br />Maximum Allowed - 25% <br />Area « 37,536 s.f. <br />Existing Hardcover - 6,230 s.f. or 16.6% <br />Proposed Hardcover ■ 0 s.f. or 0% <br />The proposal also shows that a retention pond is proposed at the end <br />of the parking lot to accept all drainage. The retention pond has <br />been reviewed by the City Engineer (Exhibit L) and he recommends the <br />following: <br />A) The parking lot grading plan should be modified to provide a <br />minimum 1% grade. <br />B) The area between the parking lot and the lake should be a <br />minimum of 6" higher than the parking lot. <br />C) Pre-cast concrete bumper curbs should be required around the <br />parking lot. <br />D) Parking lot should be paved to minimize the run-off of silt <br />into the ponding area. <br />The City Engineer further states that the proposed drainage plan and <br />ponding area is generally adequate and that the storm drainage detail <br />provided to collect the surface drainage may be a problem of plugging <br />up thus part of the parking lot would be allowed to drain directly <br />into the lake. This concern could be addressed by modifying the <br />parking lot grades as stated above to provide greater protection. <br />7. Lakeshore setback. The lakeshore setback requirement is 75*. <br />Applicant is requesting to provide the required parking spaces/parking <br />lot 10* from the lakeshore. This is consistent with the existing <br />parking lot which is also 10* from the lakeshore. <br />8. Tree removal within 75* of the lake. Applicant is requesting to <br />remove approximately 6 trees due to the location of the parking lot. <br />Applicant has positioned the proposed parking lot to save as many <br />trees as possible. <br />Staff Re dation - <br />Staff recommends approval of the following: <br />1. S 10.41, Subdivision 4 (A) - Conditional use permit.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.