My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-10-1989 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1989
>
04-10-1989 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/4/2025 9:31:14 AM
Creation date
4/1/2025 2:01:17 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
552
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
SPOT ZONING - Related to the Iraue of minimum acreage l3 <br />the issue of spot zoning. While to some degree this is <br />kn the eye of the beholder, the City has approved zoning <br />areas as small as 1 acre. (Casco Run offic oerty on <br />Shoreline Drive.) <br />6. PROCESS AMD REVIEW - While the process for PUD <br />involves the staff in a more significant role than the <br />current PRD or current PID does, the process also allows <br />aarly Council involvement into significant design issues <br />that would would not be under the,purview of the Council <br />in a standard rezoning or under the current PRD/PI ' <br />setup in the ordinances. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Further delinata the process. <br />2. Revise the proceed to meet Council goals. <br />7. FUTURE COUNCILS - This issue was raised <br />To the extent- <br />by both <br />t the <br />e as <br />:iing <br />this <br />Planning Commission and Council, <br />zoning and the zoning amendment require a 4/ <br />does a Comprehensive Plan Amendment ther^ <br />that precludes a future Council (or for that m <br />Council) fro**! alt*-ring the direction and utilization of <br />these ordlnan^'is or similar types of ordinances or <br />ordinances of f'reater concern based on following the <br />appropriate ess. The Council's implementation of a <br />Planned Devvi_:?pment will need to be within the scope of <br />the City's Compr ehens'v c Plan Amendment- seals and <br />objectives. Should t h i ?■ Council not adc broader <br />Planned Development orJuance, future Council's could, <br />re zone * property by tnc '•s e vote that is required to <br />adopt nrjv'd D^ *»’opmei • ordinance or rezone a piece <br />of p 1 Development zoning.. <br />I. vw y 0 aaopt 1 broader Planned Development <br />r :n vsvs. <br />2. Adopt a Planned Development that reflects
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.