Laserfiche WebLink
c) prior districts limitation <br />iLi DEVELOPMENT CRITZaiA - The proposed ordinance as <br />currenTly drafted references the most closely associated <br />district for standards. Depending on the direction of <br />the Council as to where and how density is applied the <br />other standards will be made applicable in a similar <br />manner. In additio.n to the base requirements of the <br />zoning code, througfi^eview process additional controls <br />would be included in a "project specific" design <br />manual that becomes an additional requirement to be met <br />by the development. (The City could have a generic <br />framework developed to indicate issues and level of <br />detail to be addressed ?n project specific manual.) <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />1. Criteria from other zoning standards. <br />2. Standards based on prior zoning/or most closely <br />related use, <br />3. "Project specific" design manual development as <br />part of developer's agreement based on a City <br />developed generic framework for a Planned <br />development specifying issues and level of detail. <br />5. MINIMUM ACREAGE - The minimum acreage to be brought <br />in for development under a PUD was initially drafted at <br />5 acres. This parallels the 5 acre minimum found in the <br />PID and MFPRD ordinance. This means that parcels of <br />larger size can be brought in for development, but thac <br />smaller parcels under 5 acres cannot be used under tiie <br />PUD ordinance. The density within this 5 acre ainlmun <br />would be subject to Council decision as to how to <br />approach density and use. <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />A. Leave at 5 acres. <br />B. Decrease. <br />C. Increase