Laserfiche WebLink
MHIUTBS OF THE PIANNI1I6 COMMISSION MEETING FEBRDMY 21, 1989 <br />ZONING FILE «1381-RBODE CONTINUED <br />hm, with the exception of the foundation. She recommended that <br />this application be reviewed with similar considerations as the <br />Johnson application off North Arm Drive, in that approval be <br />conditioned upon the existing foundation being used. <br />The general concensus of the Planning Commission was that <br />they were in favor of the proposed house not extending as close <br />to the lakeshore as the existing house. They were also in favor <br />of the reduction in hardcover in the 0-75' setback area from <br />15.8% to 13.3%. The new structure would be right on the average <br />lakeshore setback line, and will have an attached garage. The <br />detached garage will be removed. <br />It was moved by Planning Commissioner Hanson, seconded by <br />Planning Commissioner Cohen, to recommend approval of this <br />application granting the lakeshore setback variance required for <br />new construction on the existing foundation. The setback shall <br />be allowed at 59' to accomodate the 2' upper story deck <br />extending into the lakeshore protected area; the main part of the <br />house shall be at 61'. In addition, approval is recommended for <br />the hardcover variance of 13.3%, or 812 s.f., within the 0-75' <br />setback area, with no additional hardcover allowed in that area. <br />Motion, Ayes«5, 'Nays<^, Motion passed. <br />#1382 JOHN ROGERS <br />755 TONKANA ROAD <br />VARIANCES <br />PUBLIC HEARING 8:47P^- 9:00 P.M. <br />The Affidavtl rif Publication and Certificate of Mailing were <br />duly noted. <br />The applicants were not present for this matter, however, <br />Mr. Mark Lumry of Arteka Corporation, was present on their <br />behalf• <br />Assistant Planning and Zoning Administrator Gaffron <br />informed the Planning Commission that there had been a revision <br />to this proposal. There will be no increase in hardcover in the <br />0-75' zone due to the removal of an existing storage shed. Mr. <br />Lumry also explained that there would not be any additional <br />terrace area as originally proposed. <br />Chairman Kelley clarified that this application now involved <br />only the conversion of hardcover to structural hardcover and an <br />average lakeshore setback variance. Gaffron agreed. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked for clarification as to <br />the average lakeshore setback. Gaffron explained that the <br />house to the south, approximately 200' away would not be <br />affected, to the north, there were only c p buildings. Mr. <br />Lumry mentioned the fact that the existing guest house and main <br />residence were in front of the addition. There is an existing <br />brick retaining wall which would mfinimize the visual impact of <br />the addition from the lake.