Laserfiche WebLink
Maggie An <br />From: Nick Anhut <NAnhut@ehlers-inc.com> <br />Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2025 9:09 AM <br />To: Maggie Jin <br />Subject: RE: Utility Rate Study Inquiry <br />Hello Maggie, <br />Thank you and I hope you were able to get some good insights and networking out of the Seminar. <br />Our standard approach to a study is to reach an agreement on the City's preferred scope and establish an hourly rate <br />with a not -to -exceed total cost. We track our time and bill periodically only for actual hours spent on the analysis. To <br />the extent the study's scope is completed in less hours than anticipated, the final cost will come in lower. Below are a <br />couple of options for the City to consider with a potential utility rate study and some general estimates on the <br />associated costs. <br />Base Study: The base level analysis will look at current operating revenue and expenses along with the City's forecasted <br />capital costs for each fund to provide a 10-year cash flow projection will use the existing rate structure to suggest <br />general increases (or decreases) needed to deliver minimum reserve requirements. The financial model will incorporate <br />a review of summary usage data (by tier for water), and be able to insert general development growth assumptions (if <br />any) to shape the projections. The base study would not include analysis necessary to evaluate revisions to the City's <br />current rate structures. Quotes for each fund: <br />• Water Fund - $10,000 <br />• Sewer Fund - $10,000 <br />• Storm Water Fund - $6,000 <br />Fixed /Variable Cost Analysis & Rate Restructure: An optional add -on for the Base Study of each fund will perform the <br />analysis necessary to come up with recommendations on allocating the fixed and variable costs of the water and sewer <br />systems and rate structure redesign options for the City's consideration. For the water fund, it would also include <br />reviewing current tier breaks by customer type to ensure the first tier remains affordable for winter (indoor) usage and <br />upper tiers meet conservation needs in the summer (outdoor) in compliance with Minnesota Statutes, 103G.291 overall. <br />The analysis would require analyzing 12 months of account -specific water consumption. <br />• Water Fund - $8,500 <br />• Sewer Fund - $5,000 <br />• Storm Water Fund — N/A <br />Other Considerations: Looking specifically at the 2025 fee schedule, here are a couple of other potential add-ons to <br />consider: <br />• Wayzata & Long Lake Sewer Billing — It appears there are some Orono properties that are billed for sewer by <br />these cities. Are we understanding that correctly? If so, are they also providing the service? Is there an <br />agreement that should be reviewed and evaluated? <br />o Sewer Fund - $4,000 <br />• Minnetonka Beach — It appears there is a bulk water rate for this city. Is there an agreement that should be <br />reviewed? If so, another option is to provide a wholesale water rate analysis to determine if what is being billed <br />to Minnetonka Beach is appropriate for the demand placed on the system. <br />o Wholesale Water Rate Analysis - $5,000 <br />I will apologize for laying out so many different considerations, but we find that every community's goals and needs are <br />different. There can be instances when a simple analysis to confirm cashflow projections is all that is needed, and others <br />208 <br />