Laserfiche WebLink
CHESTNUT & BROOKSPROFESSIONAL .VSSOCIATION <br />ATTORNEYS AT L\W <br />JACK L.CHESTNXT <br />WILUAM F BROOKS. JR <br />KARL L. CAMERON NE* <br />CORTC.«OL'»*EN <br />CRAIG A. ERICKSON <br />DENNIS B. JOHNSON <br />ALAN B. DEMMER** <br />ROBEBT A. LaFLEUR. CPA <br />JEA NE TTE A. rP EDERICKSON <br />STUART C beak <br />"no PIPPR jAFFR,\Y TOWER <br />JL’J SHL-TH ninth strl <br />llNNE.\POLIS. MINNESOTA oj - <br />■6U1.J39-7300 <br />F.\Xi6121336-2940 <br />145 UNIVERSI'n' AVE. W <br />4T PA IT. MINNESOTA -M03 <br />'612)291 IW <br />•ALSO ADMITTED IN WISCONSIN <br />••ALSO ADMITTED IN CALIFORNIA <br />December 2, 1990 <br />Ms. Jeanne Mabusth <br />Juilding & ...oning Administrator <br />City of Orono <br />Orono City Hall <br />1335 South Brown Road <br />Orono, Minnesota 55323 <br />Jacquelynn M. Kelly <br />Zoning Filing Number: 1473 <br />Our File Number: 9244 <br />Dear Ms. Mabusth: <br />At your request, I am submittint^ * e lates*, ri i-rial relating <br />to our proposal for the reccnstructia dec : a t^e property <br />owned by Jacquelynn M. Kelly, Iccateu at 2056 .-hadywood Road, <br />Orono, Hinnesota 553S1. <br />you and I both know, there . -vs beun quite a history <br />rel-ntiiig to our attempt to come up with a resol’ that would be <br />acceptable to evervone in this case. I am hopi .^nat this last <br />proposal will adequately set Urth our position i t is matter, and <br />I would ask that you contact me p"ior to the c- * il meeting to <br />discuss any discrepancies in ' • iationr vhi ,a might exist <br />relating to the hardcover. <br />By ^ay of history, as yoi« <br />by Jacc|uelynn Kelly in August o <br />instability of the deck cur. ..t.; <br />serviced the eight sliding gl ■ ' <br />the ^'^me, Ms. hired som»t <br />perty was purchased <br />. i.rat time, due to the <br />O' the property which <br />going across the front of <br />to replace that de..k. <br />After several discussions back and forth with the City Council <br />and yourse • personal.ly, I am now hopeful that our most recent <br />proposal wiiJ ’"eet everyone's expectations in regard to the setback <br />prshlen and t.a hardcover calculation n the 75 to 250 foot area. <br />There is no dispute that the^’e should not be any hardcover located <br />in the 0 to 75 foot area, and we are not proposing any encroachment <br />in that ne.