12-10-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

13. On October 3, 1990, staff met with applicanc to review 3't3ff*s hArdcove*" deLei., inations and hardcover sketch enclosed as Page __ of this resolution. In addition, the applicant was advised to have a surveyor confirm specific areas of hardcover in question. 14. On December 3, 1990, Dennis Johnson submitted a revised survey and revised hardcover facts which now included a 372 s.f. of landscape area underlain with plastic that was never recorded in the original calculations by staff. 154 s.f. of landscape area originally designated on improvements plans for property were not included in updated calculations as these areas do not exist and are not proposed by applicant. The final hardcover was resolved as follows: 7.509.45 s.f. or 59% Hardcover existed on property prior to improvements within 1989 6.140.45 s.f. or 49% Proposed hardcover* *2,358.4 s.f. house and garage 2,350 s.f. driveway 392.05 s.f. sidewalk areas 1,040 s.f. deck 15. The plans presented for Council's review show lakeside deck encroaching average lakeshore setback by 4*. Applicant did not respond to Council's conceptual direction at July 23, 1990 meeting. 16. « propos< \ hardcover for property is 3,161.25 s.f. or 25%; 40.45 s.f. or 49%. 17. The r deck removed prior to approval by the City consis ec 310 s.f. The deck constructed without the benefit o,. .le building permit review and the proposed amended decK are both at 1,040 s.f. in area. 18. The applicant proposes new structural hardcover totaling 1,040 s.f. for the matching removal of 1,899 s.f. of non-structural hardcover. 19. The applicant and/or applicant's attorney had knowledge of the specific requirements and pertinent standards of both the zoning code and building code requirements prior t'^ construction of the illegal deck. Any hardship seems to b elf imposed. Page 4 of 6