Laserfiche WebLink
File #2341 <br />Februar>- 12, 1998 <br />Page 4 <br />)ad Improvrments and/or Eascmcuts Needed <br />Hennepin County is likely to indicate that additional County Road right-of-way should be granted <br />for future needs. The Comprehensive Plan categorizes this segm nt of Old Cr> stal Bay Road as a <br />'scenic parkway’ which requires a right-of-way width no greater then 66’. Since 66’ exists, and since <br />no additional right-of-way granted or reo' d , .om the French Creek Woods plat acioss from <br />this proposed subdivision, the City would be consistent in not requiring the dedication of additional <br />right-of-way for Old Crystal Bay Road. <br />Applicant has provided a gi ading plan for construction of the road in Outlot A, with the intent that <br />the future owner of Lot 7 wouid construct a driveway within the portion of Outlet A dedicated for <br />that use. Note that the length of the proposed road and cul-de-sac is approximately 700’, meeting <br />the City’s cul-de-sac length limitation. <br />Storinwatet/Drainage/Grading Plan <br />Exhibit E is the applicant's preliminary grading/drainage and erosion control plan. A; th!" time, <br />applicant is not proposing any stormwr>ter ponding on site. The City Engineer has recommended <br />that stormwater ponding be provided tor this site. This also need> MCWD review. The City has <br />consistently required stormwater ponds tor this type of residential development, hence tl?‘.* develope r <br />will have to make a strong case ‘o ;o« ii;ice staff that it is not needed for this site. <br />Note h"‘t most proposed grading stays within the right-of-way of Outlot a portion of the grading <br />exte/. 'h> into the adjacent lots. It is especially critical to maintain the grading 1* '•♦s within Lot 4, <br />whe^ nil will be needed directly adjacent to the primary septic site, as is also in Lc‘ 5 '• <br />Lot 1, the grading also is very close to both the primary and alternative tre- <br />extreme caution must be taken to a^oid un-iurbing those sites during the ro^ ' <br />For Lot 6, proposed graditig to create a walkout site is proposed near I • mic . i e iOt, Tnu’ <br />grading appears to cxtei . slightly m*o the bluff h < zone (20 ’ from t< • • itid : lou’d b< <br />revised slightly to avoid such encr. ..iiment. All- ; lots appear to have sv.ti n nuhng sitea for <br />the intended house types, with no grading projiosed for the building locations on those lots. <br />Utilities <br />Smee there are no City utilities serving this part of the City, there are no assessment or connection <br />fees required. The applicant is respom or arranging neces.'id»-y electric/gas/phone/cable utility <br />lines as needed .. se. vc the plat.