My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
1/10/2025 2:09:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 14,1998 <br />mO) U2425, SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERllCE 800, INC, 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - continued <br />Kelley asked if there is any action necessary tonight. Gaffron responded no, that the site plan was <br />previously approved with two conditions. One, that the sidewalk be changed from six feet to eight <br />feet; and two, that staff review the final landscape plan. He said it was not clear that the Council <br />v\anted specific changes to the landscape plan. <br />Moorse said he recalled that the general direction of the Council at the last meeting was to compare <br />the landscaping to the Otten property to make sure the two were roughly equivalent. <br />Jabbour said he understood the reason this application came before the Council tonight was to <br />discuss the park dedication fee and the letter of credit. <br />Gaffron said this item is for discussion of the subdivision, not the site plan. He believes staff has the <br />direction needed to prepare for final plat approval. <br />Jabbour asked if the applicant is comfortable with the direction provided by the Council. <br />Jean Mork Bredesoi (applies .t) stated she understood that the discussion tonight was to get direction <br />on the letter of credit '’".d me park dedication fee. She is comfortable with the direction provided by <br />the Council. <br />Kelley remarked that one of his for the corridor from Brown Road up to the schools is to get <br />rid of the utility poles that are loca .a on the north side of the road. He understands that it does not <br />make sense to require the applicant to bury the utilities just on their lot, but he Aould like the ability <br />to assess back the cost of burying utilities if other lots are developed. <br />Jabbour concurred that it would be nice to bury the utilities, but the cost would be prohibitive. The <br />cost of burying the utilities would be added to the value of the property, driving up the cost of the <br />land and increa ing density. <br />Flint stated he is supportive of the broad boulevard concept envisioned by Kelley. He would like <br />staff to look at the plan for the whole road from Brown Road to Willow to determine feasibility. <br />Kelley suggested realigning the poles on the road that is platted. <br />Cliff Otten stated he wanted to pay the extra costs and bury the utility poles on his property when <br />they were moved, but NSP would not allow it because Oiono was not interested in burying the rest <br />of the poles. <br />Page 9
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.