My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
1/10/2025 2:09:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 14,1998 <br />(UIO) §2425, SIDMEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERVICE 800, INC,, 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - continued <br />Jabbour responded that Orono would have had to pay to bury the rest of the poles. He said the land <br />in that area sells for $5.00 per square foot anc that is similar to Minneapolis. He feels additional <br />costs will add too much to the value of the lane. <br />Kelley stated he does not make decisions based on economics, bui on what is best for the City. He <br />tries to visualize what the city should be 30 years from now and how he wants it to look. He would <br />like a contingency that would require the landowner to pay for burying the poles in the future. It <br />could be assessed, like the cost of a sidew alk. <br />Jabbour feels it would be hard to justify assessing the costs because it is not a necessary service. He <br />asked if staff should look into the cost of burying the utilities. <br />Goetten commented that the Council should not burden staff if they are not going to require the <br />utilities to be buried. She thinks it would be very attractive, but she is concerned about the cost. <br />Jabbour asked staff to contact NSP regarding the cost of burying the utilities. <br />Kelley questioned the limit on the height of the light poles. <br />Goetten stated it was 20 feet. <br />Flint stated he wants to see the whole lardscape plan from Brown to Willow. <br />No action taken. <br />(*#12) AMEND FINAL PLAT APPROVAL - DRIVEWAY LOCATION - “4461” BAYSIDE <br />ROAD - RESOLUTION NO. 4217 <br />Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to ado%t Resolution No. 4217, a Resolution Regarding <br />Enforcement of Condition 2 of Kesolution No. 3346. VOTE: Ayes 4, Nays 0, Jabbour <br />Abstained. <br />MAYOR AND COUNCIL REPORT <br />Jabbour stated there will be a Highway 12 informational meeting on the 17th. He also indicated the <br />Highway 12 Design Review Committee meets the first Wednesday of the month. <br />Kelley asked about the format of the informational meeting and if there would be formal remarks <br />made by anyone. <br />Page 10
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.