My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1999
>
01-11-1999 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/10/2025 2:09:59 PM
Creation date
1/10/2025 2:09:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
232
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR DECEMBER 14,1998 <br />(#11) COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL PARK FEE - ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURE - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 4216 <br />Gaffron stated that at the November 9 meeting, the Council tabled this matter and directed staff to <br />review and compare methods for determining the park fee by using 25-30 employees per acre or <br />using a straight percentage method. He stated that for a commercial or industrial property, on <br />average, the number of employees that can reasonably be accommodated will likely be in the range <br />of 20-25 employees per acre. Using $3.00 per square foot as an average value of developable <br />commercial land, this translates to $130 000 per acre, of which 8% is $10,400. Using 25 employees <br />per acre as a standard, this is equal to 2.5 dwelling unit equivalents based on 10 employees equaling <br />one dwelling unit. Based on the minimum/maximum park fee of $2,900/$4,900 per dwelling unit, <br />a one acre parcel should pay somewhere in the range of $7,250 to $12,250 for a park fee. The 8% <br />park fee, on average, is roughly equivalent to the park fee that would be generated by the average <br />commercial/industrial employee load of 25 employees per acre, on the basis that 10 employees have <br />the same impact on the park system as a typical dwelling unit or household. Staff recommends that <br />commercial/industrial park fees will be established at 8% of the Fair Market Value of the property, <br />but not to be less than $7,250 per acre and not more than $12,250 per acre. He stated this is a clean <br />w ay to determine what the park fee should be. <br />Jabbour asked if Jean Mork Bredeson, applicant in the prior item, understood this fee structure. Ms. <br />Bredeson stated this method of determining the park fee is simple and direct. <br />Flint stated this is good language. <br />Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4216, a Resolution Establishing <br />Minimum and Maximum Park Dedication Amounts for Commercial/Industrial Zoned Land. <br />VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#10) #2425, SIDNEY AND BARBARA REBERS/SERVICE 800, INC., 2190 WAYZATA <br />BOULEVARD - REVIEW SUBDIVISION APPROVAL CONDITIONS (CONTINUED) <br />Jabbour questioned the width of the sidewalk. Gaffron stated that increasing the width of the <br />sidewalk from six feet to eight feet has been made a condition of the resolution for final plat <br />approval. <br />Kelley stated he would like to see the site plan with the eight-feet wide sidewalk. He would also like <br />to see the landscaping plan before final approval. <br />Gaffron stated the landscape plan was part of the package for the last Council meeting, but he w ould <br />be willing to review the landscape plan tonight. <br />Page 8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.