Laserfiche WebLink
Disagreement on where and on whom restrictions should be <br />placed as increased use grows. (This is apportionment <br />of the "pain".) <br />Who is in the best position to manage the lake. <br />One could characterise LMCD's position as one that feels that the <br />increased pressure for use on the lake is inevitable and that <br />"parochial resistance" by lakeshore communities will result in <br />independent, uncoordinated development of public facilities on <br />the lake by DNR, Metro Council/Hennepin Parks and/or Hennepin <br />County. These groups have other interests than those of the <br />lakeshore residents or communities and would do the development <br />without any funds to deal with the problems generated by <br />increased use. <br />LMCD's apparent compromise is that in order to retain a <br />coordinated substantially local control it by allow^r/promotes <br />selected facilities develop together with generating the funding <br />for Lake Minnetonka to provide increased regulation as the <br />pressure grows plus the promotion of facilites that will use <br />incentives to remove "active" traffic from the lake. <br />*♦ ♦ *. 4* " ‘-TV* « <br />; r <“: j* •