Laserfiche WebLink
OF THE piahhihg commissioh TIMG HOVDIBBR 20, 1989COHTIHDED’ ?on",uSSI/" ‘’"^5' • SO'■ron su9ge.ted cr..tla, . ,<,re narrow outlot A.flag” lot-. * configuatlon would create "theIt «Ah*thi*naji'Mnt VroUrtyr"^ it.elf w.ll to”u.r.Ti’u‘.'?’.r\'’d* ^«or. Clcly r«.«,l„ . conventLnir.uW* Vi*"*']* <br />,• ••PtViVyVt.is'incjtdV/in^th.'^h?'**''^”'’'’ '"‘^•'ttiv.il tt^de it very difficult. homestead pad with a <br />ten “o^onVlr.V “‘’she* <br />- .ppaVATon^U". <br />ment^ w*here a^^VertaiJ^an,^^® 5^^^ reached a degree <br />I certain amount of lota, acreage no longer <br />.nd"w‘tnVrVcou* d“V. iS.'t'w^^? <br />Lion proA~V <br />.jsTh«*touVd%VilTi?l"rdtn '’Y“'“^^ “*•ationa seeking lot area variaiff”^^^ other less <br />th said that the extension**!?#* newly created <br />the Styles property placed the <br />>f the parcel. Mabuath slit tha?Vn V^°^^cnat an area variance <br />\MZHDTBS or THE PIAMHIIIG COMMISSION MEETING NOVEMBER 20, 1989 XCnmiG PILE 81470 PARTEM CONTINUEDwould not be necessary with the 2-lot subdivision. Nabusth noted that proceeding with the 2-lot subdivision would leave the issue of accessing the northern properties unresolved.Bellows indicated that she would prefer to see a PRD if there is to be a subdivision of this property. She said that the PRO should not resemble a conventional 3-lot subdivision and,that it may be impossible to accomplish that.Kelley asked Bellows if she would accept a PRD that would have the 3 pads on Lot 1 and the septic systems on Lot 2?Bellows said yes she would accept that.Gaffron advised the Planning Commission that there is an existing drainageway running t*'rough the property over which it may be necessary for the City 3 take an easement. Gaffron said that the area for the drainageway would not have to be excluded <br />from the total area if developed as a PRD. <br />Ns. Parten said that she has tried very hard to meet the <br />intentions and directions of the Planning Commission. She said <br />that there are not any big flat areas for clustering homes, but <br />rather there are three separate building areas. <br />Bellows said that the Partens may not be able to do all that <br />they want to do with this property. <br />Ms. Parten said that they would be willing to clean up some <br />of the City's problems with access. She noted that when making <br />this application she had felt confident that due to the fact <br />there are 50 acres with the parcel and surrounding property that <br />will yield no more than 4 lots, approval would not be this <br />difficult. Ms. Parten said that it does not make sense that this <br />parcel cannot be subdivided. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown asked if a determination has <br />been made as to whether easements exist for the northwest lots to <br />cross the Luce Line? <br />Mr. Asao said that he and the Dieters have an easement in <br />the form of a right-of-way from the DNR. <br />Planning Commissioner Brown suggested leaving the Styles' <br />property undeveloped. <br />Mr. Asao said that he had looked at the possibility of <br />purchasing the Styles' property which would bring his property up <br />to City standards. <br />Kelley said that would be favorable not only to the City, <br />but it would also require the Partens to put in only a private <br />driveway to serve two houses. Kelley asked for input from the <br />Planning Commission as to the Partens proceeding with a 2-lot