03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

minjTBS or tbs PLJuniiiiG SSIOH TIMS HOVl 20, 1989; HOTEMBBR 20, 1989it would b« due to the t. He said that he had Bind just assuned that lundation and the swale that a reading with a tional 6" to 12* nearer t was necessary to takec regarding this matterseconded by Planning L of the after-the-fact ng the need to relieve louse. Chairman Kelley e a drainage easement le could look into that Lude direction to staff je easement and make a ion seconded. Motion, t> 9:40 P.M. Ificate of Mailing were this public hearing. trator Gaffron provided icatlon for a 3-lot t would be possible to rtion would end in the It lot B would serve the would serve only two / said that the issue to Planning Commission the where the septic system site is still located t configuration for Lot ZOrniMG PILE *1470-PAKT13I COHTIiniBDKelley observed that if Outlet A were put in with only a 50* easesient. Outlet A and Lot 1 will be contiguous.Gaffron suggested creating a more narrow Outlet A.Hanson noted that such a configuation would create "the ultimate flag lot ”.Bellows indicated that she did not approve of this configuration.Hanson indicated that the land would lend itself well to development with the adjacent property.Bellows suggested the property be developed as a 3-lot PRD with the houses clustered. She said that what the Partens are proposing more closely resembles a conventional subdivision. Mabusth interjected that the Planning Commission's directive to have the septic systems included in the homestead pad with a PRD proposal made it very difficult. Bellows indicated that she would not object to the septic systems being located in a commons area. She said that the septic system location is an item that had to give in order to not have this application be a typical subdivision. Ms. Parten explained that the PRD being proposed is the best that can be done due to the topography of the land. Bellows suggested that perhaps the City has reached a degree of development where a certain amount of acreage no longer guarantees a certain amount of lots. Ws. Parten said that she was frustrated because she could not understand how there could be 50 acres in an area that will not sustain 4 lots. Chairman Kelley asked Bellows for her opinion regardin9 the 2-lot subdivision proposal he suggested with the 2 outlets. Bellows replied that she was uncomfortable with the overall shape of the subdivision and the location of the alternate septic site for Lot 2. Planning Commissioner Brown observed that lot area variances would be required for two of the three lots being proposed. Mabusth suggested that it would not be difficult to make unique findings that would still allow denial of other less applications seeking lot area variances for newly created Mabusth said that the extension of the road and the inclusion of the Styles property placed restrictions on the development of the parcel. Mabusth said that an area variance \