03-12-1990 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i6 HOVBMBER 20, 1989)division. Mabusth noted on would leave the issue tsolved.prefer to see a PRD if ;>erty. She said that the 'lot subdivision and thataccept a PRD that would lystems on Lot 2?lat.ission that there is an property over which it easement. Gaffron said not have to be excludedi very hard to meet the ig Commission. She said r clustering homes> but areas. t be able to do all that 'illing to clean up some noted that when making t that due to the fact irrounding property that val would not be this lot make sense that this if a determination has )r the northwest lots to rs have an easement in :ed leaving the Styles' at the possibility of d bring his property up i not only to the City, put in only a private iked for input from the roceeding with a 2-lot Planning Commission Chairman Kelley Orono Planning Commission Members City Administiator BernhardsonMichael P. Gaffron, Asst Planning & Zoning Administrator November 14, 1969#1470 Daniel Parten, 4300 Bayside Road -Preliminary Subdivision - Continuation of Public HearingApplication - 3-lot Plat List of BzhibiteExhibit A Exhibit 3 Exhibit C Exhibit DDiscDSsion -Nemo from Applicants Large Size Proposed Plat Drawings Planning Commission Action Notice 10/20/89 Memo 6 Exhibits of 10/10/89 The applicants have met with staff and have attempted to address Planning Commission's concerns with their revised proposal, a 3-lot plat. This proposal results in three lota of 4.3, 4.4, and 6.0 acres respectively. They would be served by a 50' private driveway outlet that connects to the Reiersgord property to the east and to the Asao property on the northwest. Each lot would meet the lot width standard as measured at the 50' setback from the road outlot. Lots 2 and 3 would require a lot area variance. The applicants request that they not be required to pave any portion of the road/driveway within the outlot. They propose to construct an 18' wide gravel driveway to the turn-around area (see Sheet 2 of the large scale site plan) and a 14' wide gravel driveway to Lots 2 and 3. Alternatives - Please review the applicants' memo. They have considered alternatives to the proposal. Their Exhibit A indicates a two lot plat excluding the northernmost parcel from the subdivision, wherein each lot would contain 5 acres, being served by a 50' private driveway outlot. Under this scheme, they would not be required to pave, and this would be considered as merely a shared driveway. Such a proposal does not resolve any of the concerns with surrounding properties and would likely make it harder in the future fer those access problems to be resolved either by the City or by the affected property owners.