Laserfiche WebLink
K <br />g- <br />K';-u <br />t-' <br />■c <br />U ■■ <br />h:-' <br />W’-M' <br />‘■r. <br />-A <br />i-g: <br />■;:r 'r i- : <br />I '. <br />4-;. <br />»■;. <br />S. <br />j-<v' <br />i: <br />F.Kf;'r •m <br />. ■ /;■ <br />r\ir <br />LMCD Uoarcl of Directors October 2J, 199! <br />Apart from the fact that LHCD has never cinrrred the <br />applicant with a violation, Lef’evere resf.".>ii<Je'J that t!ie two <br />issues are separate, that of an application for deicing a <br />permanent dock, and an alleged operation of a multiple dock <br />without a license. If there is a violation of a multiple dock <br />license, LMCD should require them to secure a licen.se. LeFevere <br />does not believe an applicant should be tangentially punislied in <br />any other way for not having a license that they are otlierv»ise <br />entitled to because they may have violated any other unrelated <br />provision of the code. <br />Hurr moved, Dabcock seconded, to approve a deicing permit <br />for George Malik with staff to review tlie need for a multiple <br />dock license in 1992. Carl.son qu^^stioned the multiple dock <br />license condition until a violation has been established. Motion <br />carried, Pillsbury voting nay. <br />3. LAKE USE. Chair Pillsbury <br />A. Hinutes Pillsbury moved, Grathwol seconded, to approve <br />the minutes of the Lake Use Committee meeting of 10/21/91 as <br />submitted. Motion carried. <br />B. Resolution Limiting Signs in Channels <br />Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to approve a Resolution <br />restricting the placing of signs in channels. Motion carried. <br />C. Deposit Refund <br />Pillsbury moved, Foster seconded, to -approve a deposit <br />refund of $100 for the Nelson Wedding Fireworks. Stubbs Bay, <br />8/3/91. Motion carried. <br />D. Water Patrol Report <br />Chandler indicated there were no clianges in the report as <br />set forth in the Lake Use Committee minutes of 10/21/91. He <br />added there are two problems with snowmobile and watercraft <br />registrations. <br />1) The new registrations of snovnnobiles call for a 2" x 5" <br />sticker with 1" numbers in place of the large 3■'numbers, based <br />upon pressure from the snowmobile industry associations. <br />Snowmobile thefts and moving violations are on the increase. <br />Identification would be difficult for the deputies because of the <br />small numbers. The Water Patrol, UN Sheriff’s Assn., and other <br />enforcement agencies are trying to rally support to persuade the <br />DMR to retain the larger identification numbers. LMCD’s support <br />on this concern is needed. <br />2. A problem has developed that tlie watercraft <br />registration division of the DNR. is not proce.-,s Itig watercraft <br />licenses in a timely manner. Boatf-rs aje being stopped for Icick <br />of registration numbers. Tlie temporary license in the owners <br />possession does not help the deputie.3 to make a vi.sual <br />-continued