Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />f'i*V <br />fe- <br />■U- <br />i*. <br />L*. <br />4 <br />LMCCC Minutes-Page thre® <br />XV.UNFINISHED BUSIMESS <br />•) 1992 Budget Approval (Update) <br />Uatta reported that the 1992 Budget had passed with a <br />majority o£ the member cities approving the proposal. (0 approv­ <br />ed. 5 rejected, one still in the process) As directed, she had <br />sent a latter to those cities that had rejected the budget, <br />saying that it had passed and offering to send a representative <br />to their meeting to clarify the issue. Wilczek agreed to go to <br />the Tonka Bay meeting on October 22 and Olds would go to Spring <br />Park on October 21. <br />b) Metro Cable Network Channel 6 Signal Problem <br />Nazarow stated that the technician working on channel 6 had <br />found one problem, and would continue to look. <br />Motion i0.15.91.3t Wright moved to request Triax to appear <br />before the Commission in November with a technical explanation <br />of the Channel 6 signal problem and a proposal for resolution by <br />D^ecaber 1. Pattrin seconded. The motion passed unanimously. <br />c) Access Development Committee Proposal--Purchase <br />Bequests <br />Vatts distributed cost estimates for portable studio needs <br />and suggested postponem ■ due to staff changes. <br />Motion 10.15.91.4» Wric moved to table the access development <br />committee proposal purchase requests for portable st <-..o needs. <br />Wilczek seconded. The motion passed unanimously. <br />IfAtts presented the staff recommendation for automation, sug­ <br />gesting that members look at the two options in use in other <br />locations before making a decision. No action was taken. <br />d) Channel 21 Signal Problem (Update) <br />Watts stated she had been monitoring the situation and it ap­ <br />peared to have been resolved. <br />e) Joint Powers/Bylaws Review (Update) <br />Watts suggested that some of the changes addressed in the <br />joint powers/bylaws update process could be covered in a policy <br />manual rather than amendments to those documents. Staff was <br />directed to confer with counsel regarding this suggestion. <br />f> Access Equipment Replacement (Update) <br />The discussion of access equipment replacement had been <br />tabled the previous month, pending completion of Triax*s equip­ <br />ment survey. Pattrin asked for clarification of the <br />Commission's authority in case of a difference of opinion <br />regarding level of performance of equipment. Olds stated it is <br />not specified in the franchise agreement. Wilczek stated that a <br />good consultant as well as a record of out of service dates, <br />would help. No action was taken. <br />g> Volunteer Recognition Awards (Update) <br />This item had been covered during the production report and <br />administrator's report. <br />V.MEW BUSINESS <br />a) Salary Survey/Staff Proposal <br />Watts distributed salary survey data, including proposed sug­ <br />gestions for changes to job descriptions. Olds stated that