Laserfiche WebLink
ri"r"1: <br />K- <br />i' <br />EI-: <br />X. <br />■ S. <br />K‘ <br />^,- <br />MINUTES OF THE REOULAR ORONO COUNCIL NEETINQ - NOVEMBER 12» 1991 <br />APPLICATION #1532 - CONT. <br />Mabusth noted that Mr. Franks had composed the amendments to the <br />covenants regarding Outlot A and Outlot B and did not use the <br />services of his attorney from the Popham, Halk Law Firm, so Mr. <br />Barrett would not have a conflict of Interest In advising the <br />City on this matter. She explained that Outlot A was originally <br />to be combined with Mr. Cox's property as a condition of <br />subdivision approval, however that process was stopped by Cox <br />after It was submitted to the County because It would raise the <br />value of Outlot A after the combination was approved. She noted <br />the City Attorney should also review this request. <br />Halslet verified that the release of Outlot A was a two-step <br />process, all of which Is to be completed In 1995, and prohibited <br />Cox from building on any part of the outlot until released. <br />Callahan noted that Outlot A contains the overlap of the barn on <br />the Cox property. <br />Mabusth recognized the unbulIdabl11ty of the outlot In Its <br />present legal status. She noted that Cox wants to be released <br />from the private covenants dealing with the development. <br />Jabbour felt that the Council should not act on releasing <br />from the covenants until approval has been gained from <br />property owners Involved. <br />Cox <br />all <br />Barrett concurred with Jabbour. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Goetten, <br />Application #1532 for Fullerton Properties Inc., <br />amendments to the private covenants for Shadowood <br />releasing a portion of Outlot A. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br />to table <br />requesting <br />Farms and <br />(#13) #1S51 ROBERT WAAOE, <br />996 WILOHURST TRAIL - <br />APPROVAL OF INDIVIDUAL ENTRANCE MONUMENT - WILOHURST ESTATES <br />Robert Waade was present. <br />Moors# explained this is a request for Individual entrance <br />monuments within the Wlldhurst Estates plat. He noted the <br />following are Issues: 1) height of proposed monument at 7 1/2'; <br />2) setbacks; 3) signage on the monuments. <br />Waade submitted to Council pictures of other monuments similar to <br />those proposed. <br />Butler asked If the monuments Incorporated anything else such <br />a mailbox. <br />Waade noted they would not and perhaps only the address could be <br />Incorporated within the monument.