My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-25-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
11-25-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/26/2024 12:40:35 PM
Creation date
7/26/2024 12:38:13 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
256
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ir <br />t\ <br />.■I <br />If <br />»• <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12, 1991 <br />APPLICATION #1551 - CONT. <br />Callahan fait this should go to the Planning commission first for <br />review. <br />Mabusth explained that monument approval typically goes directly <br />to Council for review as part of final subdivision approval. She <br />noted that perhaps the Planning Commission should determine If <br />the applicant has the right to Individual monuments for each lot. <br />The plan shows a 3’ setback from the roadway, and the monuments <br />must be kept out of the drainage and utility easements. <br />Waade noted that the monuments are proposed at a 10' setback from <br />the roadway. He noted there are others within Orono that have <br />Individual monuments for residences. <br />Butler had no problem with Individual monuments If they would not <br />be 7' tall. <br />Mayor Peterson felt that the Planning Commission should review <br />the request. <br />Jabbour stated that he would like the Planning commission to <br />develop a policy for monuments. <br />Goetten stated that she has asked for this In the past and It has <br />never been completed. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Goetten, to refer to the <br />Planning Commission Application #1551 for Robert Waade, 998 <br />Wlldhurst Trail, to allow the Commission to review the proposed <br />Individual monuments. Ayes 5, nays 0. <br /><#I4) 3350 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />ISSUE OF ZONING VIOLATIONS - COUNCIL DIRECTION <br />Jim Dunn was present for this application. <br />Jabbour stated that Mr. Dunn felt that Jabbour had a conflict of <br />Interest with this natter. Jabbour has asked the City Attorney <br />to review the situation and both he and Mr. Barrett felt that <br />there was no conflict of interest. He noted that Mr. Dunn has <br />offered to sell his marina to Jabbour, which Jabbour refused to <br />purchase. <br />Moorse explained this Issue relates to commercial <br />property also being used residentially. <br />use of B-2
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.