Laserfiche WebLink
\ , <br />it- <br />V-'' ■>y-. <br />!v;'' <br />:V? <br />•«: <br />r <br />% <br />W- <br />r <br />K'>a- <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO COUNCIL MEETING - NOVEMBER 12. 1991 <br />(#11) #701 DRAGONFLY HILL. <br />1410/1420 SHORELINE DRIVE ~ <br />REQUEST BY LAND OWNER FOR CITY TO FULFILL <br />CONDITION OF RESOLUTION #1482 <br />Moorse explained this Is a request by one of the original <br />applicants that the City abide by a condition of subdivision and <br />vacation approval that would require the City to construct a <br />fence to prevent trespassing on private property. <br />Mabusth noted that the property owner was unable to attend the <br />■eating and asked that the request be tabled to the November 25th <br />■eating. <br />It was moved by Jabbour, seconded by Mayor Peterson, to table <br />the request for #701 Dragonfly Hill until the next meeting at <br />which a representative could be present. Ayes 2. nays 3. <br />Callahan felt that the Council should approve Installation of a <br />fence and the requestor may review the Issue if he Is not happy <br />with Council's decision. He noted the fence would need to be <br />higher than 3 1/2' to do any good. <br />Goetten felt the fence would not take care of the trespassing. <br />Butler noted that It would fulfill the condition in <br />subdivision approval resolution. <br />the <br />Mabusth stated that the resolution does not state that the fence <br />need to be a privacy fence. She noted that the shared lot line <br />measures 31 lineal feet, and asked If the property owner could <br />extend the fence along the County Road. <br />It was moved by Callahan, seconded by Butler, to direct City <br />staff to fulfill the obligation In the previous resolution of <br />subdivision approval by Installing a 31' long. 6' high, cyclone <br />fence along the boundary line of the properties. Ayes 4. nays 1. <br />Mayor Peterson noted she voted nay as she felt the request should <br />have been tabled as requested by applicant. <br />(12) #1532 FULLERTON PROPERTIES INC. <br />225 SIXTH AVENUE NORTH - <br />REQUEST TO AMEND DECLARATION FOR PRIVATE ROAD COVENANT - <br />A) HOMEOWNER'S NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR FUTURE ROAD EXPANSION <br />B) RELEASE OF OUTLOT A FROM COVENANTS <br />- OUTLOT B <br />T.J. Helslet was present to represent both Mr. Franks and Mr. cox <br />In this matter. <br />Moorse explained that this Is a request to amend <br />covenant related to a subdivision. <br />a private <br />.U'- <br />^ ■ <br />I-t- <br />m-'