My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
10-28-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2024 1:42:05 PM
Creation date
7/19/2024 1:39:53 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I'. <br />Hater Structures and Environment Minutes, 10/12/91, Pago 3 <br />Grathwol added that the LKCD supports the marinas being on <br />the lake, but they must recognize that licensing grants a <br />semi-monopoly for them. They will need to help share the <br />costs to manage the lake. <br />Jerry Rockvam. Rockvam Boat Yards, commented that while <br />he originally questioned whether the cost to administer <br />licenses had gone up, iie understands now that the increase in <br />fees on multiple docks is to have more money for operating <br />expenses. Grathwol responded that this is not correct. <br />What is being reviewed is the actual overall cost of the <br />licensing program against the revenue coming in. The <br />licensing program cost has been paid in part by tax revenues <br />from the cities. The increases more fairly cause the <br />licensing program to cover the cost to administer the <br />licensing program, leaving the tax funds to support the rest <br />of the programs. <br />Martinson commented that he personally is hit twice by <br />the increase, as he rents two slips at marinas, and pays <br />property ta.xes. <br />Deb Brenemanp North Shore Drive Marina, stated that the <br />marinas also pay property taxes. She supports user fees, but <br />foels that the users that do not use the marinas should be <br />paying also. Those who use public landings compose a large <br />number of users. She also commented that homeowners who rent <br />slips to outsiders are not paying the LMCD. Breneman <br />continued that this is a bad time for raising fees with the <br />economy in a recession. <br />Charlie Jones, Boat Rentals of Minnetonka, said that <br />marinas have had to discount rates for slips due to the <br />(prsviously) low water. The proposed 50^ iticrease is on much <br />less income. The perception that marinas are making money is <br />incorrect. <br />Where previously slips were renting at $1100, they are now <br />going for $500. People are not reserving slips for the next <br />year until late spring. . l t j u u <br />Jim Dunn, Lakeside Marina, said that with the debt he <br />has been experiencing, he does not expect to make money for <br />two to three more years. On his charter boat, he expects to <br />wait five years before he gets any return on his investment. <br />The economy is THE issue. Generally, people are not paying <br />the same way they did during the better years. In 1987 the <br />LMCD rates went up substantially, about the same time the <br />drought hit. Rates charged for slips have not gone back up. <br />Revenues are half what they were before 1987. The late <br />penalties are an insult. He s .ggests meeting with members <br />from the industry to review the schedule. eie <br />Jim Bean, Bean’s Greenwood Marina, questioned the 515 <br />increase per slip. He pointed out the fee is charged by HSU, <br />not slips. Bean also said he has been paying for unused <br />slips. <br />_ _ _ _ _J
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.