Laserfiche WebLink
IMPACT OF ALTERNATIVE IN PLYMOimi OCTOBER 10, 1991CRITERION12A2B2C2D2E2F2G33A3B3C44A4B1.Number of human resources within the,corridor.^0 IC <br />2.No. of rocrcAtion resources in corridor. <br />(P=*Ptrk, L=Lakc, G=Golf Course, <br />PF^Playficld. T=Tnil) <br />0 Q <br />3.No. of residential units/propertics in corridor.0 2 <br />4.No. of businesses in corridor.0 0 <br />5.Bit. construction coit (millions of 1990 $). <br />i <br />6.Accessibility (travel time) to Metro Area. <br />(G = Good) <br />7.Appropriate highway access for local <br />development? (Y *= Yes) <br />8.No. of residences within 400 feet of highway, <br />outside the corridor. <br />61 69 <br />9.No. of wetland and floodplain acres in corridor.0 1 <br />10.No. of woodland acres in corridor.0 0 <br />11.No. of acres of agricultural land in corridor.0 0 <br />12.No. of acres of Ag. Preserves farmland in <br />corridor. <br />0 0 <br />13.Safety and efrictcncy of trafTic on existing TH <br />12. <br />14.Local trafTic movement across/adjacent to <br />existing TH 12. <br />15.Level of service on existing TH 12 in peak hour. <br />y 16. Level of service on TH 12 alternative in peak <br />hour. <br />17.No. of eounty/local road segments likely to need <br />capacity improvements. <br />•S^SchoO', DC = D«y Care Center, M -Municipn', C»Church, H ” Historic Structure, CM “Cemetery, LB“Libnry