My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1991
>
09-09-1991 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/9/2024 2:27:25 PM
Creation date
7/9/2024 2:24:48 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
290
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ArrnciH/HrTi-' <br />TO:Mavor and City Counci-A <br />RFSOM;r^.ark E. Bernhardson, City Ad.T.inistratot <br />\ rp <br />DATS: March 20, 1991 <br />SUBJECT: Position Reclassification Assistant Finance Director <br />Golf Course Supervisor <br />Attachment:A City Compensation Plan 3/22/88 <br />b! Asst. Finance Director/Position Reclassification <br />Memo Dated 3/4/91 <br />TSsnE - Determine if Council will authorize the reclassification <br />oT^e following positions based on review of the positions: <br />Assistant Finance Director <br />Golf Course Supervisor <br />Is-H-TA <br />Classification should be reclassified that would be reviewed. <br />&rnll«”t III <br />Finance Director - The points reflect the <br /><!evelopient of tHe position and more fully relates to <br />the current Assistnat Finance Director s <br />would change it from a Level 5 to a Level 6 t.he <br />Doints having gone from 60 to 67, This would result in <br />rchange in the position and given that the initial <br />analysis was done^^back in September it is <br />ihla chance would be retro active for the position <br />bJjJ tS l.p2J22:r ”nd\h.t th. individual would than be <br />up for a regular review on September, 1991. <br />V <br />'A-' <br />r««r.a suoervisor - As a result of this analysis it <br />« to Level 7 with points 9oin, <br />^ «r?S ?2: Cl».n however, that the position was <br />paying more than what was permitted at inertaseclassification would not involve a compensation increase <br />■ irv. -
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.