07-22-1991 Council Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Th o participating orgon iealioiw foU that th e LMCP shou ld take an oj live ro le in amymg that Nikoohof "W>mniuniti€c concictcnUy »iifof«»d th » thorel oiHi regutatiom auopie dmider th « «i ght. Since varwhicpc are th e nwohan ism that *~»pef» to ex6»od"fitni6tMre liwite, the LMCD shall develop agreements with local communi.. '-.view variance applications. The LMCD shall notify tne eiry ot its position on the variance. \ns. .'icr, the city shall notify the LMCD of the decision of its Flan Commission and its Council. In-order to jiBplMiMii(--ilija-pfeee66r-(h«--y4CD-M«<ls-the -tr>.4^nd-«apaMHy-te-fefidly--ra»pend-te-Meh appliaalionai[connent; portions struck at request >>( cities; remainder is basis for policy 20, p. 15] (coramcat: folhnrlng "objectives ” 4 through 13 and the accompnnying discussion will be considered for Indusion in the revised recreation chapter] 4.The LMCD shall take an active role in the development of plans for any public shoreline nermtioHui fadUty that is potentially cf regional signlficonce. ’ LMCD has broad legislative authority'over public hri'is cn ’ : kc. That authority includes operation, maintenance and policing oflarids used for acce < :o the ! ikc. That authority’ shall he used to cooperate with implementing agencies to assure the ini '^esr; of all users of Lake Minnetonka arc conddered during the plan process as well as during operutic'.s Further, the LMCD shall fn 'iHtaie cooperation and coo^irtate involve'***‘nt between regional . gencies and local communities while maintaining its role as advocate for the resource. As plans are evolved for future paries of regional attraction, the LMCD shall be involved from the be^auung in decisions about faciUtiesprovid^ artd their location. The basis for this involvement is their emuideraUe authorUy over such fadtities. 5.The LMCD shall maintain its poUey of not owning or operating shoreiine recreational facilities but shaO to fetter cooperation and facilitate coordination for beUer located and developed on-shore reereationd t^portunkies. Presentfyt mum^talttien, Hennepin County. Suburban Hennepin Reponal Park District and the Department of Natural Resources actively m.j* yfge pubuc lands on the lake. Tnere does not appear to be reason for LMCD to undertake resportridlity in this area. LMCD resources shall be o”-<-'ted more toward its traditional areas of eperatioru 6.The goal far parking at boat access points shall be to provide sufficient formal parking in the vieutity (f mnjar access points whidt utilises remote parking facilities, facilitates handicapped aepess, and minimize* on-street parking, lakefivntage, water quality effects, aesthetic intrusions and aUnimizm dfect on local and neighhorkaod traffic fiow. Large parking anas adjacent to the lake aru 'o*fpprapriate since they an counter to rbjectives develtqaed to protect walands, water quality and ir,yrnae development on the iakeshon. The hardcover limitation tff25 p^r'-dnt of die lot ana all but .nch/Jes contiruiing the existing practice of building access poba parkb.^ vnediatefy adjacetu to the take. Under the water quality, wetland protection and shonland management objectives, such paridng areas shall be nmoved from the Iakeshon as opportunity arises. V parking anas shall be mbject to the shoreiand management, water quaiity and wetland protection afforded in this Long-Term Marutgement Ptart On-sOeet paridng causes cor$gestion on city and county streets disnipts neighborhoods, interferes with i J