Laserfiche WebLink
parcels arc in public ownership, are available to the boari/te public, arul where phvsical failures are <br />favorable, rafting aui beaching are imponani acthities. <br />MANAGEMEyrOBJEO'11VES [generally this section might be better described as policies lather <br />than objectives; where retained, they generally appear in the 'policies* section of the new, combined <br />chapter] <br />the stondards and criteria that <br />Im-G [comment: "managing entities* is undcrmed. Appendix C is <br />recommended to be dropped, and since cities are required to rollow state rules in un> case, <br />this policy statement is not needed] <br />During doMelopntent of ■ the-plan, porticipatiog organiz.uionf' .irrivt«d—at—ibe cr>nclusinn—tbat <br />manag ement of the shoreline was awainttol to jmxeotion of tbe lake.—to ligh t Ilexibilitv <br />provision A(?)of the revisod DNR shofeline manag emunt regu latH>ns (Minnefiota Rul 'f,. Cb. 6120;; <br />the LMCD shall-take a more active role in assuring consistent regu lation development afid <br />redevelopment-of -the shoreline. To do-this. the LMCD shall actively encourage the adoption of the <br />more restrictive Standards and Criteria in Appendix C by the 14 lakcshore communities as well as <br />promoting acceptance of such ordinances by the DNR and the Metropolitan Counci! [comment: <br />strikeout portions are not needed or fac s objection from cities; remainder is basis for policy 16. <br />p.l4] <br />The LMCD shall contact Oitch lake city that actively undoriakor. land we planning for dovolopnvent <br />to determine » the District may participate-as an interested party. The District shall also meet with <br />the Metropolitan Council to establish procedures to allow the District to comment on the plans and <br />amei.dmcnts as they arc submitted to affected jurisdictions and the Metropolitan Q)uncil during plan <br />vv wv. process provided by the Metropolitan Land Planning Act. [comment: strikeout portion not <br />neviicu, remainder is basis for discussion under polio' 18, p. 14] <br />2. To wduc-y the aesthetic ^act of high-rise devi lopment, the LMCn shoil encourage <br />govfing couneils of nearby eoromunities to exhibit restraint in approving variances and <br />conditional use permits for buildings that will be \isible from the lake's surface and <br />shoreline. <br />Aaslhatias diroctly in <br />Minimum Standards <br />users of-the lake surface. Accordingly, the <br />maximum building heights for the shoreland. Butt it-i* wot <br />is beyond 4he shofolandsi Given the suburb-wi <br />xs-surrounding the lake and the fact that structme height in non lokeohore <br />{ry Plymouth, have the potential ?o affect aesthetics on and near the lake, the LMCID <br />shall influence case by case proposals through negotiatiooi—This-ean be done directly with-the <br />involved as well as w4th the Metropolitan Couf>ci>. [comment: objective 2 <br />formed basis for policy 17 on p. 15 in the combined chapter, remainder struck out as recommended <br />by cities] <br />-------The LMCP shall counsel with lake eities in reviewing ood eomreenting on vuriaiKx?